- 1. [TowerTalk] re-visit W3CRA's old QTH - - Aaaaaarrrrrgh! (score: 1)
- Author: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:51:44 -0400
- Interesting discussion and analysis by W4ZV in 2005: http://users.vnet.net/btippett/w3cra.htm I believe I found what's left of the yagi again: Googleearth: enter 40.244932N, 80.181509W in the " fly t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00194.html (6,965 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] re-visit W3CRA's old QTH - - Aaaaaarrrrrgh! (score: 1)
- Author: vk3pa@vk3pa.com
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:01:23 -0500
- _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00195.html (7,740 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] re-visit W3CRA's old QTH - - Aaaaaarrrrrgh! (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:11:49 -0400
- What's interesting about W4ZV's analysis is that one antenna, strategically placed on the side of a sloping hill for a distance of about one mile, is on par with, or better than multiple stacks over
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00201.html (8,025 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu