- 1. [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: K4FJ@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:18:18 EST
- I found no problem. No photo was posted. Only a link. Bill said it was R rated, so you didn't have to view it. But, you did. Bill handled it well. Time to get a life. ________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00442.html (7,114 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: "James McLaughlin" <dearborn9@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:35:55 -0600
- R Very well said. Not a big deal as I see it in the first place. Everybody that it really bothers should just take a big breath, you'll get over it and everything will be OK. Now back to towertalk pl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00443.html (8,473 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: WD0M <wd0m@centurytel.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:41:35 -0700
- "Handled it very well"..........hmmm..........why should it have had to be handled on Tower talk reflector in the first place? Simply inappropriate. At 05:35 PM 2/22/2004, you wrote: -- Original Mess
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00445.html (8,434 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: "Gerry Smith" <w6ter@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:00:14 -0700
- WD0M < you're wrong. Gerry Smith, W6TER "Handled it very well"..........hmmm..........why should it have had to be handled on Tower talk reflector in the first place? Simply inappropriate. was and __
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00448.html (9,444 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Gates" <regates@kingwoodcable.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:13:25 -0600
- I personally had no problem with the e-mail in question, I get these types of notes from my friends all the time. But I guarantee you that if my born again, very devout Southern Baptist father-in-law
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00449.html (8,525 bytes)
- 6. RE: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: "John [N5BSD]" <n5bsd@rblprd.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:07:08 -0600
- Try this again to the list at large :/ I am just going to throw my 2 cents here If we stop and look at EVERYTHING and ask if ANYONE will be Offended, then we will likely not post anything anywhere. I
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00454.html (9,584 bytes)
- 7. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:42:41 -0600
- Everybody is right. 1) The link had no place on this board, warnings or not 2) No one should blindly click on links without thinking first and making sure that's what they want to do. If such a perso
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00456.html (9,575 bytes)
- 8. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: "Durwydd MacTara" <durwydd@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:59:12 +0000
- How can the lady be ground crew with no hard hat? "Communications" is a People skill, the rest is technology. Durwydd MacTara _________________________________________________________________ Get fas
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00457.html (8,313 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] re: Ground Crew (score: 1)
- Author: "KK7MG" <KK7MG@Hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:47:45 -0700
- But I guarantee you that if my born again, been same applies. ** I understand your point, but why would your Father-In-Law have clicked on the link in the first place when he saw that it was "R" rate
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00463.html (8,823 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu