Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+re\:\s+quad\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+re\:\s+quad\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:02:56 +0100; Didn´t K3BU make the statement that his razor was 10 dB better then the 6L KLM and the KLM was 10 dB better then the 5L Telerex? Result would be that the razor thing was 20 dB better then the T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00235.html (8,333 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:10:52 +0100; As a matter of facts, a number of yagi antenna designs popular on the 70' and 80' were far to be really optimized, and this explains why antenna shapes (spacings, lenghts) and results of different in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00237.html (10,985 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 07:34:35 -0800 (PST); Well, all the nasty comments aside, Yuri's antennas DID work and work VERY WELL. Yuri is very compentent and certainly can tell over the course of time if something is working better or worse than so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00243.html (9,649 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: PBARKEY@gw.bsu.edu (Patrick Barkey); Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 11:08:21 -0500; As a matter of fact, W9RE is 100% yagi these days. The world changes. - Pat N9RV Well, all the nasty comments aside, Yuri's antennas DID work and work VERY WELL. Yuri is very compentent and certainly; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00247.html (10,381 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@arrl.net (Eddy Avila); Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 16:36:17 -0000; Guys, this all sounds like a bunch of school-yard kids in a "pissing contest!" However, I remember my dearly-departed mother who always told me: "No matter what anyone claims be suspicious if what th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00248.html (11,674 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:26:27 EST; Let me again explain or underline what I was saying. I didn't say "that his razor was 10 dB better then the 6L KLM" and I didn't say that this was real, actual and measured gain figure between those; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00252.html (15,696 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:47:11 -0800; BMV wrote..... Big deal....I have seen these kind of "10 db" (or more) diffrences in the same make and model of antenna at the same QTH - because the antennas were at diffrent heights. If you add in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00254.html (9,913 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: nt6b-vk7lm@dreamsoft.com (Lonnie (NT6B)); Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 11:37:43 -0800; Hi Yuri....thank you for all your thoughts and trials on your antenna and what you feel makes it superior to Yagis...truth is, unless your comparisons are done at the same time, same location, same t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00257.html (21,825 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: gclute@home.com (Geo. Clute); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:34:04 -0800; <snip> I've worked this out now. Yuri has accomplished the F2 layer VPN and he has given the amateur community selective F2 layer propagation. Will he share his optimum slice of F2? <grin> George Clu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00260.html (8,268 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 23:20:33 -0600; W9RE has replaced his 10 and 15M Razor beams with 3 and 4 high stacks according to a friend in Indiana. BTW, weren't these outrageous claims made by subjective comparisons to stations that may have b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00266.html (10,686 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:42:24 -0800; Hi All Comparisons are meaningless otherwise! I once had a TH-3 up here and was never satisfied with it. I took it down and put up a 20 meter 2 element monobander. It worked much better, or so it see; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00304.html (8,867 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:47:15 -0800; They are available commercially. CB'ers use them. Think they are called "Moonrakers" (nifty name huh?) They use quad reflectors and crossed directors. Tom W7WHY -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00305.html (8,173 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:24:29 -0000; Tom A Moonraker are not really a quad. It is a 4 or 6 element beam that has both vertical and horizontal elements, it has a switch to select either vertical or horizontal polarization but unlike a q; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00308.html (8,546 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] re: quad (score: 1): Author: nt6b-vk7lm@dreamsoft.com (Lonnie (NT6B)); Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:34:24 -0800; Hi Tom and the group...only in part Tom...You talk about the Moonraker...well take a minute......the original Laser (Their spelling) was introduced by Wilson Electronics Corp. back in the 70's and it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00309.html (10,487 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] Re: quad (score: 1): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:29:10 EDT; < In fact, I am slowly working on modifying a battered matchbox here to remove the 50/300 tap business and replace it with a switched tap and series variable input side--the only improvement I could; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00832.html (10,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]