Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+re\:Non\-traditional\s+antenna\s+designs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] re:Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:58:17 EST
Hello: Speaking of non-traditional antennas (or maybe more accurately: novel designs): Check out the tunable yagi at www.fluidmotion.ws. This is by far the best idea I have seen for an multi band yag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00650.html (7,705 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] re:Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
Author: dhb@mediaone.net (Dave, AA6YQ)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:27:41 -0500
Given that one can vary element lengths but not element spacings, how close to monoband performance can one get with this approach? 73, Dave, AA6YQ Hello: Speaking of non-traditional antennas (or may
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00652.html (8,995 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] re:Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:23:53 -0600
A 14 to 18 ft boom is a reasonable compromise from 10 thru 20M. Band 14 ft boom 18 ft boom 20M 0.2 WL 0.26 WL 15M 0.3 WL 0.38 WL 10M 0.4 WL 0.52 WL See the W2PV Yagi Antenna Book Chapter 2 Figure 2.9
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00661.html (8,497 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] re:Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
Author: dhb@mediaone.net (Dave, AA6YQ)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:45:16 -0500
Thanks -- should have thought to look there. penalty at .2 WL is ~1.5 db and at .5 WL is less than .5 db. Best case F/B requires a .3 WL boom, with a 8 db penalty at .2 WL but a serious 25 db penalty
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00662.html (10,036 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu