Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+remote\s+tuner\s+Vs\s+lumped\s+constants\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:47:18 -0400
I have several 160 and 75 meter antennas. I'd like to be able to cover most og these bands with the least involvement from the shack after the initial set-up. I run QRO, so matching low impedance ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00461.html (7,444 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:23:00 -0700
Here's another approach, that you, as an engineer, might appreciate. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/PacificonSmithChart.pdf I replaced a lot of Ten Tec antenna tuners with coax and relay switching. 73,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00477.html (7,599 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:25:18 -0400
Here's another approach, that you, as an engineer, might appreciate. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/PacificonSmithChart.pdf Now that looks Intriguing! I'd like to end up with an SWR no more than 1.5:1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00479.html (9,139 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:53:30 -0700
The fan dipole on 75 can give much wider, usable areas. With SS amps I'd like to be able to QSY with all the knob twisting. Yes. It's easy to make wire spreaders by cutting 1/2-in PVC conduit into 18
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00480.html (9,135 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:55:35 -0400
The fan dipole on 75 can give much wider, usable areas. With SS amps I'd like to be able to QSY with all the knob twisting. Yes. It's easy to make wire spreaders by cutting 1/2-in PVC conduit into 18
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00488.html (10,998 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:34:12 -0400
I don't understand the problem with copperweld. I have three 160 meter quarterwave slopers and three 80 meter bent vertical dipoles using alumoweld that have been up about 40 years with no problems.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00497.html (12,774 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:40:14 -0700
How much stress is on them? My antennas, and Glen's antennas, are flat top dipoles, up 100 - 120 ft between very tall trees that sway a lot in the wind, fed with 150 ft or so of RG11, with 100# count
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00498.html (8,568 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:59:05 -0400
On 7/24/2013 11:34 PM, Gene Fuller wrote: I don't understand the problem with copperweld. I have three 160 meter quarterwave slopers and three 80 meter bent vertical dipoles using alumoweld that have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00499.html (12,627 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:58:11 -0400
I agree! Both here in south Georgia and in Virginia I had 80m dipoles made with copperweld wire. In both QTH's I had storms that felled the trees holding up one end of the antenna wire, come down dur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00501.html (14,645 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:24:48 -0500 (CDT)
agreed, I use 10ga copperweld here for Beverages and inverted V's and L's and the only break I have had was at the top corner of an inverted L where it flexed too much. I have had ice and trees come
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00502.html (15,060 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:44:23 -0400
I also have never heard of OWL spacers being eighteen inches?? Where the heck did that come from? Typically 600 ohm OWL requires only about four inch spacing. Who uses open wire line these days? It w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00503.html (9,308 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:23:23 -0700
On 7/24/13 8:59 PM, K8RI wrote: On 7/24/2013 11:34 PM, Gene Fuller wrote: I don't understand the problem with copperweld. I have three 160 meter quarterwave slopers and three 80 meter bent vertical d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00505.html (10,428 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:03:34 -0400
As the saying goes: YMMV...! I have Yagi's for 40 through 6m, but for 80m I use 4" spaced OWL feeding the copperweld about 600 feet away from my house. The spacers for the OWL is made from plastic co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00506.html (10,273 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:53:24 -0700
I have 600 feet of 450 ohm OWL to my 160 meter transmit vertical. I used to have 1000 feet of it coming from my old shack location that was farther away. 4 AWG stranded THHW aluminum on 5 inch center
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00514.html (9,865 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:12:30 -0700
Yes. If you ever have the opportunity to visit one of the vintage short wave shore stations still in existence you'll see a LOT of open wire coax line feeding rhombics. One typical form of constructi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00515.html (10,099 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:14:29 -0700
As the saying goes: YMMV...! I have Yagi's for 40 through 6m, but for 80m I use 4" spaced OWL feeding the copperweld about 600 feet away from my house. The spacers for the OWL is made from plastic co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00520.html (9,977 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu