Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s*$/: 71 ]

Total 71 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 06:35:32 -0600
Mercy. Rarely has an off-topic thread built up such a head of steam. When I was studying for my General at 11 years old, the only license manual I could find at the public library said in it that ham
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00359.html (8,736 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Michael Neverdosky <mikenever@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:40:54 -0500
What the hell does this have to do with towers??????? You want to talk about fact you better go find a new pres. as the one in office now has no grasp of facts. At least President Clinton did not tak
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00362.html (9,815 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: WW4T@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:01:05 EST
Anyone know where I can find a political site to discuss towers etc??? Please hurry.....73 Bob _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00363.html (8,199 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:18:33 EST
First, no. You can thank the crash of the telecom industry. Last, when we start talking about NAFTA and unions, we've not in TowerTalk discussions anymore. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TT ADMIN ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00364.html (8,378 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Gregg E. Salomone" <spectrum@shs-medstaff.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:20:21 -0600
n6ta@arrl.net Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomput
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00365.html (9,582 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Michael J.Castellano" <km1r@cshore.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 06:22:22 -0500
All the politics aside, one of the major reasons Rohn got into this mess is poor market strategy. When the Cellular/PCS frenzy came about they steered most manufacturing towards that end of the indus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00366.html (9,042 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:37:32 -0500
No, management. Al Toothaker wrote: Do we thank NAFTA for this one? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00371.html (8,887 bytes)

48. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:35:05 -0500
It would seem to make good business sense for one or more companies to acquire the manufacturing rights to some, if not all, of Rohn's products. Another possibility would be for one smart entrepreneu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00375.html (9,430 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:01:29 EST
Huh?!? I thought that was done by good old Joel at First Call Communications. This is pretty slanderous. If you have some thoughtful comments to make, I for one would like to see them. If you're just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00377.html (8,464 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:39:44 EST
Gee whiz, I have unleashed a Frankenstein monster with the Rohn post. I have started a Republican vs. Democrat thing, a NAFTA debate and a badmouthing of another tower company. All I wanted to do is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00379.html (8,192 bytes)

51. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Al Toothaker" <n6ta@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:48:47 -0800
My apologies for originally mentioning NAFTA. Will 'put a cork in it' next time.... Al N6TA Mercy. Rarely has an off-topic thread built up such a head of steam. When I was studying for my General at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00380.html (10,074 bytes)

52. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:16:16 -0800
Hi Bill, Look at it this way...as a group, we're all getting older and rather crotchety. Sometimes, we all spill comments (from the heart) that would not be spoken out loud. As for Rohn goes, I since
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00381.html (9,528 bytes)

53. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:52:53 -0500
Steve, My comments are the result of frustrating attempts to obtain technical information from Tashjian about an LM-470 tower. It has taken far too many e-mails and snail mails to even get their atte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00396.html (12,058 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:10:10 -0500
"And it was a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS...which Clinton worked with, that gave approval to NAFTA...that includes the Republican congress Bush worked with when he was president." This is factually incorrect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00397.html (10,039 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:47:38 -0500
Facts? Blaming ONE political party for a decision you don't like is LAME, INFLAMMATORY and IRRESPONSIBLE! Behavior not even to be tolerated from a 4-year old! (It's THEIR fault even though I did it t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00400.html (10,808 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:37:55 -0600
While I have to admit, many of us got a little carried away with the political parts of this message, one has to wonder why someone would start out political, then state that the political had no pl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00412.html (10,353 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:44:43 -0600
That is what has happened. The business was sold. One plant has been shut down, another is still in operation, and they are moving some equipment from the shut down plant. __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00413.html (9,455 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:55:21 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Do as I say, not as I do. As old as the human race. -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00414.html (9,587 bytes)

59. [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:03:40 -0500
The reason is very simple.... Grossly inaccurate and inflammatory comments need to be addressed - especially when the result of the rant is to distort the truth. If someone who didn't like "Northern
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00415.html (11,165 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Pat Poirier" <hkman@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:15:58 -0500
Why are we all crying over spilt mike????? If Rohn was mismanaged and they were not turning out the proper and quality product as advertised. Then they end up biting the bullet. I am sorry to see the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00416.html (9,721 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu