Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s+25\s+flat\s+or\s+tapered\s+top\s+section\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s+25\s+flat\s+or\s+tapered\s+top\s+section\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] rohn 25 flat or tapered top section (score: 1): Author: stetrekve@yahoo.com (steve sala); Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:57:43 -0800 (PST); My tower has a tapered Rohn 25AG2 top section. I am going to put a Force 12 5BAD on top with a 8 element 2 meter beam 12 feet above it and a comet 2/440 vertical at the apex. The tapered top section; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00016.html (8,105 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] rohn 25 flat or tapered top section (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 00:17:48 -0800; Hi Steve, I agree that the 25AG2 is not the best choice for the top section you need. My choice would be a 25AG3 because it allows you to raise the mast off the rotator, secure it in place with two s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00050.html (9,853 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] rohn 25 flat or tapered top section (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:43:02 -0500; You probably don't need it. The tapered top section will do the work that a thrust bearing would. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00226.html (7,997 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] rohn 25 flat or tapered top section (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:52:54 -0500; For the installation he specified, he doesn't NEED a thrust bearing. There's some debate about that -- given the construction of your typical Rohn thrust bearing. It does more to keep the mast straig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00243.html (8,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]