Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s+25g\s+guying\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s+25g\s+guying\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] rohn 25g guying (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:45:43 +0000; Mike, You need to be aware of your local code, with respect to tower height and setback. It may not be possible to go to 70'. You will be better off with 25G than what you presently have, regardless; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00200.html (6,995 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G guying (score: 1): Author: "John Lyles" <jtml@losalamos.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:31:02 -0700; My 1960s Rohn catalog shows the upper guys usually connected to the top of their towers. Current Rohn literature shows it down about 5 feet from the top. One obvious advantage of this is that it give; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00390.html (8,280 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G guying (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:40:09 -0500; Both have advantages and disadvantages and there is a fair amount of leeway with the attach point just as there is in the guy angle and placement of the guy anchors. Mounting down 5' with EHS also gi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00391.html (10,860 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G guying (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:42:43 -0500; I should have mentioned this earlier. In that case I'd much rather have the guys at the top than a ways down. They are easier to rotate around while also rotating the antenna, but as I said in the ot; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00392.html (9,499 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]