Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s+qusestion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rohn\s+qusestion\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "merlin-7" <merlin-7@sc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:34:47 -0400; What is the difference between the short sections that you bury in concreate and a regular 10 foot section? Thanks _______________________________________________ ____________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00854.html (7,042 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:24:40 -0400; 5' feet and 6'8" Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00855.html (7,871 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:47:46 -0500; And are the legs of the bury-able section sealed at the bottom? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contes; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00856.html (7,445 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:54:00 -0400; No and you DO NOT want them sealed; the tower legs must be able to drain. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00857.html (7,940 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "merlin-7" <merlin-7@sc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:00:22 -0400; You would not want to seal the ends....water in the tower needs a place to drain to...sand or gravel at the bottom of the hole... _______________________________________________ _____________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00859.html (8,737 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:03:10 -0500; I found this information on Rohn 25G thanks to those subscribed to this list and it was extremely helpful. Reading it now. http://www.radiancorp.com/ROHNNET/rohnnet2004/html2004/index.html It even te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00860.html (10,902 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "merlin-7" <merlin-7@sc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:02:56 -0400; No difference in wall thickness etc? Bottom sections are just shorter? Is it better off cost wise to just buy a normal section for the base and get the few feet extra in height? Thanks again ________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00861.html (9,294 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:35:55 -0500; The shorter ones as I understand it are so you can leave them behind in the ground without leaving your tower behind if you move and so when you calculate height you don't loose 4ft in the ground. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00862.html (12,053 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:51:40 -0400; No difference in construction. Cost decision is yours to make depending depending on which half section you want to throw away when you move. Id personally never buy a new half section. Carl KM1H ___; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00863.html (10,466 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]