Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rotatable\s+k9ay\s+and\s+more\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rotatable\s+k9ay\s+and\s+more\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] rotatable k9ay and more... (score: 1): Author: ik3umt@ir3ip.net; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:34:26 +0100 (CET); Hi All Here I come again on (unanswered) question about rotatable k9ay loop I've never considered this antenna before since I was not really interested in topband 'til now (after 14 years of hamradio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00173.html (7,954 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] rotatable k9ay and more... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:56:09 -0800; That is correct, Frederico I have never tried this, but in principle you should be able to connect the two perpendicular loops in parallel a move the null to the line 45 degree line that bisector the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00176.html (9,512 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] rotatable k9ay and more... (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:36:18 -0600; If your purpose is to try and null out a specific signal, then rotating the loop may have some merit. If your purpose is to obtain better signal to noise ratio, then I think rotating the loop is wast; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00180.html (11,620 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] rotatable k9ay and more... (score: 1): Author: "peter.voelpel" <peter.voelpel@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:40:05 +0100; Hi Frederico, check the reflector on Yahoo concerning details and/or use Google. I read some stuff concerning a modified switchable arrangement for 8 directions with the K9AY loop. With that there wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00189.html (9,411 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]