Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rotor\s+comparisions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rotor\s+comparisions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: Gregg Seidl <k9kl@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:25:25 -0600; Which is better and why?M2 2800 or whatever they call it now,Prosisteil PST-61 or Hy-Gain HDR-300.Looking for a stout rotor to turn some big stacks of uhf beams in a high wind area.I have a PST-51 up; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00568.html (7,843 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: EL34GUY@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:31:27 EST; You might consider the alfaspid rotor as well. A very heavy worm gear driven DC rotor. Check their website, its turning some big stuff. 73 Mark W0NCL _______________________________________________ S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00569.html (7,010 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: "Craig Miller" <dcm@stanford.edu>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:37:57 -0800; Greg, In terms of brute strength, quality of worksmanship, and dedicated customer support from Wyatt Lyzenga and colleagues in Fresno, I don't think you can beat the M^2 Orion OR2800 PDC rotator base; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00570.html (9,563 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:00:27 -0500; I'm not familiar with the M2 rotor, but to me, the HDR- 300 isn't even in the same league as the PST-61. I went through several HDR 300s in as many weeks. I ordered the PST-61 and it's been going a g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00573.html (9,293 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:09:55 -0500; Oops... You also asked why. The PST-61 is rugged, requires no brake and has no play. The HDR 300 requires a brake, the brake switching is really odd ball in that you have to manually turn off the bra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00580.html (10,492 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:01:23 -0500; The M2 OR-2800 is a great rotator. Just Check the specs. Also, service from M2 is outstanding... 73, Ted K2QMF P.S. - Make sure you get the new version with the green readouts.. Has all the updates.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00584.html (12,622 bytes)
7. RE: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:33:33 -0500; Did M2 ever do anything about the awkward programming of the control box. It just didn't seem simple to change direction when I operated a several year old 2800. This unit made you read the manual on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00585.html (13,800 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:14:36 -0500; Hi Tony, I don't know about the older version however, the new or-2800 is very easy to program... 73, Ted K2QMF ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00586.html (15,374 bytes)
9. RE: [TowerTalk] rotor comparisions (score: 1): Author: "Roger Huntley" <snr.huntley@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:16:06 -0800; I have a new 2800 and the first one had to be sent back to the factory because it took 20 seconds to turn 15 degrees and made a loud hum in the receiver when it turned. It took several telephone call; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00587.html (14,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]