Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rotor\s+placement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rotor\s+placement\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor placement (score: 1): Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:00:17 -0700 (PDT); Greetings, Let me chime in with my experiences. If you already have a tower up, retrofitting to a bottom rotor will be a major undertaking. Building up the tower and mast at the same time is far easi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00259.html (7,647 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor placement (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:28:23 -0400; It's not bad on a 45G (My feet don't even touch the mast), but I'd hate to be doing it on a 25G. Otherwise find a climber with small feet. Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00260.html (8,557 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor placement (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:37:40 -0400; Hi folks, Heck, I'm a big guy and I am comfortable on a Rohn 25 section! Sure a 45 section would be nicer, but I can function just fine in my boots on the 25! 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00261.html (9,183 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor placement (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:30:25 -0400; The issue is climbing that tower with a mast running up the middle of it. I agree, the 45 is much better under those circumstances than the 25. 73 Gil, W1RG -- Original Message -- From: "J. Gordon Be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00262.html (10,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]