Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+screwdriver\s+ant\s+vs\s+75m\s+dipole\s+at\s+40\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+screwdriver\s+ant\s+vs\s+75m\s+dipole\s+at\s+40\"\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] screwdriver ant vs 75m dipole at 40" (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:25:09 -0700; Last evening a couple guys ran a test of signal strength of the two antennas with several stations separated from 10 to 200 miles apart. The dipole was about 2 s units stronger at all locations. I su; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00027.html (7,692 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] screwdriver ant vs 75m dipole at 40" (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:45:45 -0400; The dipole is at 40 INCHES height? If you're comparing a dipole at 40-FEET above ground with a mobile-type antenna, the Dipole will surely be more efficient for all intents and purposes. Remember, th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00029.html (8,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]