Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+small\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+small\s+antennas\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:53:38 -0400; Well, IMHO, I think the Cushcraft A4 would be a good choice of antenna. I have been using CC antennas for 30 plus years and have yet to have had a problem with one. My only failure was when my tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00575.html (7,577 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:17:53 -0700; Why did you change the name of the thread? Dino - K6RIX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00579.html (6,700 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:32:12 -0400; I agree. I have used the Cushcraft A4S for years and the A3 before that. I also have the 3 element SteppIR and two A4S's up, one of the A4S's is about the same height as the SteppIR. Often the A4S i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00600.html (8,278 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "Michael K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:01:05 -0700; The 3 element Steppir is sure hard to beat, a 1:1 SWR on all bands 40 thru 6 meters, with the 30/40 kit installed. I had a A3 Cushraft for 20 years and had a few problems with the traps, but it worke; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00603.html (9,609 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:40:19 -0500; Missing pieces of this puzzle: Are signal levels lower on the A4S? Do you get better reports on the SteppIR? You didn't say. This won't be much of a puzzle if signals are better on the SteppIR :) Ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00607.html (7,443 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:40:01 -0400; Jon ... to correct the record the A4S is a three element yagi on 10 meters. The trapped reflector is active on 20/15 and the single reflector is active on 10 meters. With the A4, the longer boom prov; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00613.html (7,946 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:22:34 -0400; Thanks for the clarification, Joe. As to the comment I made about the SteppIR being noisier on 20 compared to the A4S, I really have no explanation for it. The reverse should be true, and I first pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00623.html (9,213 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: NØATH <n0ath@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:05:22 -0500; Jon - I was just wondering - I have never had or even been close to a steppir but from what I have read and surmised there must be a bit of fiberglass on the steppir or so it seems to me - If this is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00624.html (9,929 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:15:44 -0700; Jon, Mike has mentioned your A4S vs SteppIR S/N situation and we were both baffled. I think the description of your antenna farm has probably answered the question. Having a 402CD 14' above the Step; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00627.html (10,172 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:04:22 -0000; The 40-2CD normally stacks well with a tribander, but may affect 18 and 24 Mhz. It can also affect 10, 15 or 20 if an "unlucky" length of feedline is dangling off the 40-2CD's driven element. The eas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00634.html (9,569 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:04:06 +0000; Dave: Shouldn't the RX's AGC be turned off for these measurements, too? 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00636.html (11,460 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] small antennas (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:37:57 -0000; -- No, because you are using your receiver S-meter, which needs agc to drive it. It helps though to have the nearby ham adjust his power so that, with your antenna pointed away, he is about S2, or wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00638.html (8,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]