Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+stacking\s+antennas\s+\&\s+Rohn\s+specs\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: k1my@nlis.net (Bruce Makas)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 08:04:43 -0400
I am installing several Rohn towers and want to stack antennas on the towers. Being a "good" amateur engineer, I intend to follow the specs in the Rohn catalog. My question is about the allowable pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00331.html (11,238 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
towers. out If you read Note 4 in the General Notes, you'll see that Rohn has already deducted 8.0 sq.ft. for a symmetrical commercial antenna mount. It's my understanding that if you take the 12.3 a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00333.html (10,226 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 02:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
towers. Being a "good" amateur engineer, I intend to follow the specs in the Rohn catalog. My question is about the allowable projected area that is called out by Rohn. For example, if I were to put
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00442.html (10,230 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 08:09:53 -0600
Figuring Ultimate Tower Load I recall being told that the limiting factor in (Rohn) tower specifications is the ultimate load bearing capacity of the bottom section. (I think this came from a Rohn sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00445.html (8,832 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: k4isv@mikwest1.westky.com (k4isv@mikwest1.westky.com)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 02:45:21 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Since I have addressed this before I will be brief: on a 190ft rohn 45 i have 2 5 ele 20m - 44 ft boom es 3 4 ele on 26 ft booms; on a rohn 25 180 ft i have 2 6 ele on
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00512.html (12,257 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 10:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
Two things: First, Bud, you live in one of the most benign wind spots in the country - the whole state is only 70 MPH, the lowest rating given. Second, you don't always get a ticket each time you spe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00522.html (9,042 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 10:12:19 -0400 (EDT)
Two things: First, Bud, you live in one of the most benign wind spots in the country - the whole state is only 70 MPH, the lowest rating given. Second, you don't always get a ticket each time you spe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00523.html (9,047 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: dick@merlin.libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 11:35:32 -0700
Why do I find that a scary proposition?! :( -- Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada Visit http://www.delphi.com/electronic/ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions:
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00536.html (8,348 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: k4isv@mikwest1.westky.com (k4isv@mikwest1.westky.com)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 01:41:37 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> last nite with gusts over 60mph... did cause the 3 ele 80m beam to slip a bit but fixed it this am... have had two tornados hit my qth causing a 2 ele klm beam to fold
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00542.html (10,589 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] stacking antennas & Rohn specs (score: 1)
Author: k4isv@mikwest1.westky.com (k4isv@mikwest1.westky.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 03:43:22 +0000
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> hi ron, my rohn book is very old and gives about 4 different guy configurations for different wind loads... i use the the top rated one. i also use torque arms, very gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00575.html (9,809 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu