Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+stacks\s+on\s+40\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+stacks\s+on\s+40\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] stacks on 40 (score: 1): Author: Bill via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:14:17 -0400; I've had quite a bit of experience with stacked 40s. 170/85, 200/100, 150/80, 200/90. All were M2 4 elements. I can tell you the bottom one on all of them added to the performance. First, it made the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-07/msg00305.html (9,331 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] stacks on 40 (score: 1): Author: Dave Sublette <k4to@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:45:49 -0400; I wish I had the expertise with computer analysis that is being displayed during this discussion. If anyone would like to do some analysis on my location, I would love it. For 28 years, until last Fa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-07/msg00308.html (9,351 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] stacks on 40 (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:18:17 -0400; Dave, Why sad? If you enjoyed using it then it served its purpose. Having the ability to switch just means you can optimize some of the time - MOST of the time the stack is the strongest and if one h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-07/msg00313.html (11,215 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]