- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:50:54 -0700
- In fact, I believe there is a fairly elegant paper out there that bounds the impedances for a given spacing, so one could, from a theoretical basis alone, show that if you put a fixed tuning/matching
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00353.html (9,340 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
- Author: <john@kk9a.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:31:17 -0400
- The most gain, best F/B and best SWR do not all occur with the same element settings on a yagi antenna. There is a compromise setting and you can set it for whatever is most important to you - usuall
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00354.html (10,586 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:41:42 -0400
- I don't think so Jim. If that were the case there would be no F/B and the current would not be binomial. The three element Yagi works so well for F/B because elements have a 1:2:1 current ratio and
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00355.html (9,158 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:33:08 -0700
- There's no analysis behind my statement.. probably should have been to a "zeroth order estimate" _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerT
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00356.html (8,863 bytes)
- 25. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
- Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:29:33 +0000
- Real interesting comments from everyone in response to my questions--thanks. Yes I assumed some sort of balun would be used--I made no mention of it because it is a standard part of yagi design usual
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00357.html (9,158 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu