Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+steppIR\s*$/: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Lambert, N1IK" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:47:37 -0500
Gary. Good points. We'll just have to wait and see. If we see massive failures in 5 years, there will be a class-action suit against FM by angry amateurs who will allege that Mike knew the design was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00745.html (11,399 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:41:51 -0700
Not trying to incur the wrath of the SteppIR owners out there.... I know there are those that complain loudly about f12 and their lack of support via email... but I have sent THREE mails to SteppIR a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00411.html (7,244 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: Joe - WD0M <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:51:08 -0700
Hi Gary, Not a problem - SteppIR owners have the same issue - the boys at SteppIR are snowed and take a little time to get to their e-mail. May I suggest the old fashioned approach of using a telepho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00414.html (8,082 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Todd" <ron@k4wz.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:04:20 -0400
You have to take care of anything. I took a direct lightning hit and it took out one of my stepper motors. I climbed the tower and replaced it. By the way, SteppIR charged $100 for a new motor. But i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00140.html (6,357 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Todd" <ron@k4wz.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:05:07 -0400
Right Tom And my tower is not on I 285 or downtown Atlanta which is lot more dangerous than up a tower. If I cant get up the tower, I got plenty of Ham Friends who can. ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00152.html (6,595 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Smidt" <xveoneov@primus.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:47:47 -0300
Give us a break!!!!! Think about it!!!!! How many SteppIR beams have been sold??? How many problem antennas have been identified here???? Mine has been up and working great since June 2002. If you do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00879.html (8,930 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:50:19 -0400
Carl, your bragging doesn't make any sense at all. For any specific band most monoband antennas will stomp a SteppIR, assuming that the boom length is the same or longer than the SteppIR. For band ho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00882.html (10,306 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: <sabrams@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:05:22 -0400
Also, all the talk about one antenna stomping on another is really silly when the differences for similar boom lengths are in tenths of dBs and the qth differences shown from HFTA can be as much as 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00884.html (11,899 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Smidt" <xveoneov@primus.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:12:09 -0300
What 'bragging'??? Read my e-mail again, or have someone read it to you. You obviously didn't understand its content. 73, Carl VE9OV _______________________________________________ __________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00890.html (11,239 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Kirk" <kirk.harding@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:23:59 -0500
Next to some of the comments that have been made regarding the tower accident; this ranks as a downright stupid argument. To say it is tedious is a major understatement. Come on guys, grow up!! Kirk,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00891.html (11,605 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:29:49 -0700
Talk about tedious. Your constant bashing of a product that you obviously have no experience with and know very little about is more than a little tedious. Your earlier comment that boom length is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00892.html (9,064 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:30:33 -0400
Bob, That's complete nonsense unless you are comparing something like a 60 foot boom monobander. YO shows a 1 dB advantage for the 4 element over the 205CA because the 205CA gives up gain to maintain
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00899.html (9,496 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:59:45 -0400
Joe, have you been smoking weed again? It's affecting your brain. Your logic makes no sense at all. A 4 element on a 34 foot boom at the same height and optimized with YO or some other optimization p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00903.html (10,718 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:04:15 -0400
Bob, Obviously you have not done the work. I have just rerun the models of the BV205, Hy-Gain 205 and the 4 element SteppIR in YO and the results are unequivocal. Both the Hy-Gain and BV designs give
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00906.html (11,861 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:34:17 -0400
I don't want to get in the middle of this, but I just ran EZNEC models comparing the 4-el SteppIR and Force-12 EF-420 on 20m at 96'. The SteppIR boom is 32'; the EF-420 boom is 30' (and presumably op
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00908.html (13,458 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:02:06 -0400
Something is VERY wrong with those gain figures Dick. Are you adding ground gain? And if the F/B is real Im not at all impressed with either. I could demonstrate at least 20dB F/B and 30-35 dB over 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00910.html (15,066 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:43:06 -0400
It would be interesting to compare the 4el SteppIR and a 5 element 10m beam with the same boom length. I think you would see a bigger difference on 10m, especially with F/B. John KK9A To: "'Bob Maser
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00923.html (8,674 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:15:05 -0400
Yes, you will see a significant difference in F/R ... the five element, 32 foot boom will provide 20 to 25 dB across 28.00 to 28.80. However the gain difference will be less than .3 dB. 73, ... Joe,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00946.html (11,011 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:45:37 -0400
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00011.html (15,093 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:38:30 -0400
Yeah, I think there's something wrong with the F/B in my models. I'm looking into it. The figures I posted included ground gain. The forward gain of 14.36 for SteppIR and 14.29 for Force12 are about
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00015.html (17,261 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu