Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+steppIR\s+topload\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+steppIR\s+topload\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] steppIR topload (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:06:03 +0000; I've been contemplating using a 3 el steppIR as top loading on a 50' tower, to get on 80 & 160. The recent thread on this topic suggests that there have been no observed problems with control wiring.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00069.html (6,927 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] steppIR topload (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:13:17 -0600; If I was going to do this, I would do the following: 1. Route all cables either down the center of the tower, or taped to one leg. The cables should be routed such that they are always close to the t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00071.html (8,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]