Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tiewrapping\s+rebar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tiewrapping\s+rebar\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] tiewrapping rebar (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:26:44 -0000; Been following this thread with some curiosity. Rebar is normally wire-wrapped, to hold it in place until the concrete forms around it. Somewhere in here, someone discussed GROUNDING the rebar...and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00533.html (7,645 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] tiewrapping rebar (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:00:56 -0400; See: http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_PEN1030.asp The Ufer ground is intended to be part of the grounding system, not the entire system. From my research, it appears to be a very good addition to the gr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00534.html (8,211 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] tiewrapping rebar (score: 1): Author: Zoran Brlecic <WA7AA@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:34:16 -0700; Jim Jarvis wrote: A million amperes flowing through the rebar will cause the concrete to explode. I thought this was an urban legend. Do you have an actual real life case? No testimonials, please. 73; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00536.html (7,209 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] tiewrapping rebar (score: 1): Author: "Steve Gehring" <stevekz9g@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:06:05 -0700; N2EA is right. Lightning protection shouldn't just rely on the tower base's UFER ground according to NFPA and UL industrial comm. site requirements. In new construction, the rebar cage in the tower's; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00537.html (11,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]