- 1. [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: "rca" <rca@rcallen.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:25:36 -0600
- I want to put up a 60 foot tower at 32:47:30.797 N, 98:03:28.370. This is 1800 feet northeast of runway 13/31 at the Mineral Wells, Texas airport (KMWL). The airport manager, K5MWL, told me that wher
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00570.html (7,242 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Tower at Airport (score: 1)
- Author: michael castellano <mjpc48@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:07:35 -0800 (PST)
- Rich: This is simpler than most people realize. first, with all due respects to a fellow ham, don't go by the airport manager. He is not the FAA and is not responsible if dthere is a problem. Simply
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00576.html (8,593 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:08:02 -0500
- Part 17 is pretty clear. It's not complete in that is doesn't even mention clear zones and alignment with runways. or the exemptions to go a given distance above the top of a house and surrounding t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00590.html (9,637 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: Patrick <list_patrick@complete-office-installations.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:59:53 -0500
- I love those people. You would think with all of the "big metal birds" flying overhead that they would have had a clue before they moved in. Personally, I would enjoy hearing the "noise" and would ha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00593.html (7,804 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower at Airport (score: 1)
- Author: HFDXJUNKIE@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:28:26 EST
- Mike has it right, go to the website. Generally anything close to the airport 20 ft above any existing structure or trees with need to be determined hazard or non hazard to air navigation. You can ac
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00595.html (8,904 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:10:46 -0600
- Patrick: In the mid-1960s they developed the master plan for 35,000+ acres of land for between Dallas and Fort Worth for D-FW International Airport when there was nothing but farmland and weeds out t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00596.html (10,288 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger Kissel" <kc8hz@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:35:51 -0500
- I have to laugh at the regs for towers and other obstructions that are a reasonable distance from any airport. They must have been written by politicians and bureaucrats who have never been in a plan
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00598.html (8,434 bytes)
- 8. [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: "Neil & Heather" <neil.goodell@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:58:48 -0500
- <The 1 foot in 100 is a rule to avoid registering the tower. It the proposed tower is above this rule, or 200 feet or higher it MUST be registered. Once registered (approved), the information is plac
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00600.html (7,425 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: "Van K7VS" <wa7fab@cdsnet.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:22:07 -0800
- No Neil. If you tower falls within the FAA rule you must register your tower BUT the FAA does make exceptions for just what you mentioned. That is "surrounding terrain." In two instances, once in Med
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00601.html (10,145 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] tower at airport (score: 1)
- Author: k1vr@juno.com
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:53:45 -0500
- ALL of the questions asked so far in this thread are answered in the FAA advisory circular on "Objects that May Affect the Navigable Airspace." https://www.oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaaEXT/content/advisoryCir
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00602.html (8,436 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu