- 1. [TowerTalk] tower cost #2 (score: 1)
- Author: Greenacres113@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:45:03 EDT
- scrounging tower is great if you're looking for smaller size towers. say rohn 25. i live in nw tn. in the country. i've got 6 rohn towers up. at his new qth so we put up a gnd/plane for vhf & one of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00492.html (8,120 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] tower cost #2 (score: 1)
- Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:31:45 -0400
- And you do see the occasional ones for TV antennas, now not being used, that are Rohn 45! _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers",
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00500.html (9,860 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] tower cost #2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:59:41 -0400
- According to the Rohn specs, I would need Rohn 65 here if I want a tower without guys -- which I do. Alan NV8A On 08/24/04 02:31 pm RICHARD BOYD put fingers to keyboard and launched the following mes
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00505.html (7,679 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] tower cost #2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:15:45 -0400
- My (unstated) purpose in posting this was to counter the message seemingly implied in so many posts here that Rohn tower sections are so widely available that nobody needs to shell out big bucks for
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00515.html (8,663 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu