Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tower\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tower\s+question\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower question (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 02:46:40 GMT; Well first I didn't get to read aall the replies to my orginal post, Hotmail decided to dump all my e-mail before I could read it! Of course what do I expect for free right? Well from the replies I d; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00292.html (8,165 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle); Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 22:44:34 -0400; I'm posting this again because I think it bounced... Hello all, I'm getting close to digging the Big hole for my crank up. I am going to have to put the tower behind the house and the house has Alum.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00062.html (8,093 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle); Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 23:01:32 -0400; Hello all, I'm getting close to digging the Big hole for my crank up. I am going to have to put the tower behind the house and the house has Alum. siding on it. Will that effect a 1/4 wave sloper for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00876.html (7,549 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Dave" <davebehlen@softhome.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:19:18 -0500; Found you email on a Tower disussion in a forum. I was considering purchasing a Rohn tower starting at section 5N, then 4N up 3 sections past that. The 4N section when laying on a flat drive next to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00067.html (7,268 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 21:07:35 -0400; I'm not sure from the description just how much the section is twisted. However were it me, I'd not use any section with a noticeable twist. Roger Halstead (K8RI, EN73 & ARRL Life Member) N833R, Worl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00077.html (8,357 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:23:25 EDT; which Maybe, especially since it's the bottom section it'll have an effect on the rest of the structure. You can be real conservative and not use it but you might try standing the tower upright and t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00082.html (8,166 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: ValErwin@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:30:34 EDT; Steve/Dave: I have been successful in taking bent tower sections to a body shop in the past......... I had them put the slightly bent sections on their auto frame machine and they straightened them r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00083.html (7,320 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: calandra1@cox.net; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:02:41 -0500; Hello All, After many years of being inactive, I've been given the opportunity to become active again. A close friend has graciously offered his tele-tower to me for free. My question is...the tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00634.html (7,144 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] tower question (score: 1): Author: "Greg" <ab7r@cablespeed.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:41 -0700; Looking for some info on a tower I am considering buying. The owner thinks it's a telex but is still looking for the paperwork. It's a VERY heavy duty 72 foot crank-up that at one time had a motor un; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00612.html (7,287 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Adrian Rees (MW1LCR)" <rees.a@btconnect.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:00:10 +0100; Hi all I have 4 towers that I will soon be installing. Two of the towers have a base type mounting system, which is no problem. The other two are the subject of this post. Each tower has a base, some; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00003.html (7,702 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:10:44 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Guys are the way to go but I'd use something more rigid like wood 2x2s or similar. You don't want your guys to stretch in the wind, even a little bit. Bill, W6WR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00004.html (7,576 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Clint Talmadge" <unclebudd@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 15:25:11 -0500; One way is to assemble the base and the first section. After the hole is dug, place the base and first section in the hole and brace this assembly with lumber after making sure the assembly is straig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00006.html (8,335 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:03:25 -0400; How about both? http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/tower13.htm This is how I set the bottom two sections for my 45-G The wood frame supports the sections to keep them from sinking through the cr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00007.html (8,811 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:31:48 -0500; A picture is worth a thousand words. Noticed the downspout watering the tower. Has it grown since it was planted, hi? 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00009.html (10,051 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Greg" <ab7r@cablespeed.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:49:05 -0700; I use miracle grow on mine... started out as a WT-51 and is now an HG-70HD. Better stop feeding it though...much more and will violate county setback codes. 73 Greg AB7R A picture is worth a thousand; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00011.html (10,545 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 03:17:19 +0000; TT: I'm sure it started out as a handful of iron filings, just like all good towers. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00014.html (9,983 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:33:57 -0400; Ohhhh Yahhhhh.... From 20 feet to 97. Do you realize how many truck loads of iron filings and water it takes to grow something like that? 73 Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00016.html (11,296 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] tower question (score: 1): Author: "k2vi" <k2vi@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 10:27:23 -0400; hi guys, can someone guide me as to what tower to choose. Im looking at a 45-50' tower that will somehow either retract or fold down for easy access to the antenna/rotor. I want a tower that is basic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00385.html (6,755 bytes)
19. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:43:35 -0500; Your answer seems to be talking about a tiltup, not a crankup?? Wilson W4BOH _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00028.html (6,589 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1): Author: Bill Winkis <kc4pe@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:10:23 -0500; The LM-70 is a crank up/tilt over type tower ./.. There is a motor system that will run the tower up and down with a positive function both ways, this is fine.... But when the tower is nested you can; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00044.html (8,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]