Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tower\s+restrictions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tower\s+restrictions\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: thevaliantkid@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:44:06 -0500; Recently I Saw A listing on restrictions with a link to a ham lawyer and his site wich let me tell you was very user friendly and helpful but a computer crash has lost all my saved info could you ple; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00330.html (6,531 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "SJ W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:31:21 -0500; John, I think you are looking for the website of Fred Hopengarten K1VR http://www.antennazoning.com/ He has a book published by ARRL on the subject. There is also a list-server called Ham Law 73, Sco; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00331.html (6,800 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Eugene Balinski" <eugeneb@nni.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:10:12 -0500; Check with Fred Hopengarten K1VR. He is a lawyer and wrote the book (literally) on tower restrictions and related. http://www.antennazoning.com 73, Gene K1NR -- Web mail provided by NuNet, Inc. The P; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00335.html (8,065 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] TOWER RESTRICTIONS (score: 1): Author: N1BAA - Jose Castillo <n1baa@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:50:25 +0000; Good evening all, Just moved to Amherst, MA and looking for anyone who may be in the same local...like east of the CONN River.... Seems the city has a 35 foot limit on towers and according to their z; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00507.html (6,741 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:15:33 -0400; Just moved to Amherst, MA and looking for anyone who may be in the same local...like east of the CONN River.... Seems the city has a 35 foot limit on towers and according to their zoning laws which I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00513.html (9,130 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Carrington, Walter" <Walter.Carrington@umassmed.edu>; Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:50:03 -0400; Hi Jose, It looks to me like you can go at least to 65'. If it is reasonable to go higher than that on your lot, you may be able to get a variance. "Seems the city has a 35 foot limit on towers and a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00557.html (9,692 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: N1BAA - Jose Castillo <n1baa@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:59:27 +0000; N1BAA UPDATE: After sending the city manager and a few zoning board members a very nice email, complete with attachment of PRB-1, their own ByLAWS etc.....and pointing out to them that they are actua; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00565.html (11,263 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:38:19 -0700; Congratuations on your success, Jose. Will look forward to your big signal. FYI to members of the list. There is a very good email reflector from attorneys who are hams and specialize in legal issues; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00568.html (7,620 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: "James M. Daly" <AD1L@AD1L.COM>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:06:33 -0400; Congratulations Jose, it seems you are all set but in case no one has mentioned it, and for future reference a stronger hand then PRB-1 itself is the fact that its basic language has been written int; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00578.html (8,470 bytes)
30. [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:39:24 -0500; The more I read all the interesting stories about what can go wrong with trying to put up a reasonable tower I think I'll stay here forever.I guess I'm lucky,I put up an 85 foot tower this year as we; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00473.html (6,885 bytes)
31. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:24:26 -0800; I live in a community where the city gov't officials are not able to walk and chew gum at the same time. There are many hams here who have towers etc who, like me, have never been hassled by anyone f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00476.html (9,360 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:38:23 -0700; That's convenient, but possibly not wise. I wonder what your insurance company's position will be if your tower falls down and causes a lot of damage (or injures someone), and you can't show that ins; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00477.html (8,662 bytes)
33. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:12:55 -0700; Agreed. My strong preference is to move to a city or county where there is a well established, clear, and easy to follow zoning ordinance that clearly covers ham towers and then get the building perm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00479.html (11,739 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Scott McClements" <kc2pih@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:34:22 -0400; In my case my city has verbage that ham towers are exempt from the height limits and setbacks laws. It differentiates between a cell tower and ham tower. That's good. What is not good is that buildin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00480.html (8,868 bytes)
35. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:08:32 -0700; And, thankfully, ham radio will adapt and find a solution. Towers, beams, and rotators came about as popular in the ham world because they were an way to do something in a small area that previously; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00484.html (10,364 bytes)
36. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:55:30 -0500; "Furthermore, if we had the weather conditions specified in TIA222 Rev G, does it matter that I would come home after a weather event and find my tower standing and all trees and my house leveled? -S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00487.html (7,967 bytes)
37. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:16:30 -0400; Pictures and in my case the ROHN catelog/book. It depends on your carrier. Many, if not most areas that exempt ham towers or exempt them up to a specific height before requiring engineering data will; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00490.html (11,024 bytes)
38. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:24:08 -0400; Yes, that was attempted here in my county but several of the hams that worked for the county stopped that notion cold and hams can now built towers up to 50ft w/o interference from codes...they can g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00492.html (10,728 bytes)
39. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:42:37 -0700; And what if you put up a tower without a permit and a bunch of neighbors complain until the city comes and tells you that your tower is not permitted because it is an accessory structure and must con; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00493.html (13,616 bytes)
40. [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:32:33 -0500; I'm not one to leave things to chance but sometimes I think we get way to wound up on the "what if's". I also own the land between me and my neighbors on my side of the street.All I meant to say is t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00494.html (8,118 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]