Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tower\s+restrictions\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:54:08 -0400
This is confusing the issue of whether a permit is even available. Here, the zoning allows ham towers to 100' with out engineering requirements or a permit. You only have to abide by the set back rul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00500.html (10,919 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: Martin Staffa <geitaemort@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
I have been going back and forth with the town first it was a permit then it was no good they pulled it before I could even dig the hole.Then it went to town attorney for review,came back must give r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00501.html (8,651 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - N3JPU" <n3jpu_gary@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:52:36 -0400
That really bites! I am currently putting up a 60' tower at my new QTH in Anne Arundel County MD, close to Annapolis MD, and the permit approval was easy. Up to 100' residential towers are easy if yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00502.html (10,100 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: Bob Alexander <realex@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:50:01 -0500
Howdy, I am fortunate to live in a city with what I consider the best of all possible views about amateur radio towers. I suffered some storm damage to my tower this spring and was concerned I would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00505.html (8,738 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:34:11 -0400
North Brandford was never a 70 mph wind zone under the earlier "fastest mile of wind" measure for basic wind speed (EIA/TIA-222-E; ASCE 7-88); North Branford was a 85 mph fastest mile of wind zone. P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00506.html (10,022 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1)
Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:37:50 -0400
TT: Can we put this one to bed, now? Have we whipped it enough, yet? Are there more war stories to be told? The takeaway: * Legal compliance is recommended * Being a good neighbor is recommended * Ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00508.html (9,310 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Hill" <rehill@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:37:24 -0700
Not quite on topic, but a developer in San Diego got a permit to build a "sky scraper" in the path of an alternate landing pattern, just out of the airport authority. End result? The developer had to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00528.html (10,864 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:01:13 -0400
First that is a very old article and the FAA was not powerless. A bit more background: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070812/news_1n12sunroad.html Just a search on Montgomery field and Sun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00536.html (11,289 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Hill" <rehill@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:38:35 -0700
Not really fair to repost part of an article and comment on the part not repeated. The first link provided the developers view. August 12, 2007 hardly qualifies as 'very old' when discussing planning
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00553.html (12,689 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:24:04 -0400
It is old, or if you prefer "out-of-date" as much has happened since it was posted including 1000 residents signing a petition and lawsuit. The pilots view has nothing to do with the statements, only
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00558.html (10,219 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu