Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tribander\s+stacking\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] tribander stacking (score: 1)
Author: k9kl@gbonline.com (Gregg Seidl)
Date: Sat Jun 7 20:59:53 2003
I would like to know if one can still get about 300 degrees of rotation using one of iix'sswinging gate style side mounts IF you use a 3 element yagi.I was trying to picture that but I think my view
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00125.html (6,729 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] tribander stacking (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ)
Date: Sat Jun 7 22:06:56 2003
There is a good diagram of clearance you get from their sidemount at the WX0B Array Solution Site...while your IIX size is different this will show the downfall of having the driven element in the mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00127.html (9,048 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 18:50:29 +0200
Hello guys, I have read quite a few posts here but I still am not sure about the distances I should use to stack my tribanders. I am rebuilding my contest station CR6K in Portugal from scratch, meani
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00372.html (8,040 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 14:06:33 -0400
This is for a different type of tribanders- KT36XA. Upon consultation with M2 and HFTA, I came up with 105' and 68', for a stacking distance of 37'. My terrain is completely flat and at about 1200' a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00373.html (10,309 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:53:31 -0700
Given the propagation conditions likely in the next few years, a stacking strategy may be better if optimized for those conditions. For tribanders, "optimal stacking" is where you want the best perfo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00375.html (10,813 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:45:51 -0400
A third tribander is unnecessary if your stack matching device allows to feed the antennas out of phase. My first inclination was to stack 3 antennas and then came across the microHam stacking device
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00376.html (8,085 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 17:33:40 -0400
"As a personal choice", regardless of where you are located in VE3 land, a "fixed" tribander will limit access to portions of the US. Im in Michigan, and find everything between 90 and 280, necessary
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00378.html (9,882 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 20:14:03 -0400
Have you modeled this in NEC2? The antennas are really close together, even for 10m. I think a two stack would be a better option. Yes they should be fed with equal length coax. John KK9A I have read
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00380.html (8,440 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: Marcelo Egues <marcelocx2dk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:33:51 -0300
Hola Filipe. No es facil stackear multibandas y tener una mejoria constante en todas las bandas. Alguna banda sera la beneficiada y otras las perjudicadas. En 20 metros de torre, 3 antenas son demasi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00387.html (10,435 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: Tom_N2SR via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
My 2 C31XRs (14 elements each) are stacked at 40 and 80 feet.   I added a F12 "custom" 5 element 10 at 23 feet.   I feed the tribanders with separate feedlines, so I essentially have 3/3 on 20, 4/4 o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00390.html (10,554 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu