Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tuning\s+the\s+beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tuning\s+the\s+beam\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: k1jn@99main.com (Joe Natale); Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 12:26:27 -0400; I just built the A4S/A744 Cushcraft 4 el tribander with 40m kit. I built it on a mast about 4' above the ground using the band center dimensions. The 1:1 SWR points are: 6.9, 14.050, 21.3 and 28.7. D; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00432.html (7,794 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: wd4ngb@m2.sprynet.com (Bruce Richards); Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 17:13:58 +0000; I have found over the years that if you can not put it up at least 1/4 wave above ground for testing/adjusting clear of other objects, it is better to support the antenna in a way that it stands on t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00435.html (9,352 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 13:41:59 -0400; Joe, -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00437.html (8,610 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 13:45:07 -0400; While Bruce's ideas have merit for testing an antenna, the Cushcraft A-4S and other beams do not require testing/pruning etc. The book values are fine and will work just fine. I would add that modern; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00438.html (10,605 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: k1jn@99main.com (Joe Natale); Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 21:07:44 -0400; I recently posted a question regarding tuning a triband beam prior to mounting it on the tower. I built it on a mast about four feet above the ground. I wanted to know if I should try tuning it at fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00708.html (8,316 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 01:14:35 -0700; HI Joe. It just goes to show ya, "When in doubt, read the manual" :-) 73 Tom W7WHY -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requ; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00709.html (7,800 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:12:17 -0600; Yep, build and install works pretty well for most commercial antennas. For those who like to tinker, hanging the beam with the boom pointing straight up is a good technique. There was a piece in QST; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00714.html (10,262 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] tuning the beam (score: 1): Author: k1jn@99main.com (Joe Natale); Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:18:19 -0400; Thanks, I meant to type reflector... I had been up for 24 hours and just finished an all day tower installation. 73, Joe K1JN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00739.html (8,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]