Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+vertical\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+vertical\s+dipole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] vertical dipole (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:35:09 -0000; Hi Tim, You got it exactly! A vertical dipole avoids the IR losses in the ground, but not the absorption and brewster angle effects at first reflection. They're outside your control, anyway. If the r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00220.html (7,640 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] vertical dipole (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:25:29 -0500; My experience with 40m vertical dipoles vs. horizontal dipoles with centers at the same height (50') is that signals inside of 4-5k miles are down by 4-6 dB. Sometimes more. Signals beyond that...out; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00079.html (7,944 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]