Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+what\s+size\s+wire\s+for\s+kilowatt\s+TX\s+\?\?\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Ewing" <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:04:21 -0500
Not to belabor this (and we're stretching the limits of "towertalk" here)... FWIW, a quarter wave is not "short" in my view. I calculate (using the L << lambda approximation in Johnson's Antenna Engi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00088.html (13,536 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:09:26 EST
I have a novel idea, just put one up, and see if it works! 73 Chuck KI9A In a message dated 1/4/2009 5:05:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, martin.s.ewing@gmail.com writes: Not to belabor this (and we'r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00089.html (13,622 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:10:33 -0800
good point.. I was thinking parallel, and you're right. Have to convert it to a parallel equivalent to determine the circulating current. Jim _______________________________________________ _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00091.html (9,666 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:28:34 -0500
I almost missed this as it was sent to "undisclosed recipients" which often gets flushed at the ISP. From a practical approach without going into all of the math and limitations, I've used ~132' (giv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00094.html (9,527 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:52:03 +0000
Martin, I'm happy we can agree, and draw a line under this. I only joined the discussion to challenge your original statement that: "This all assumes you're talking about a full size dipole. If your
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00096.html (9,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu