- 1. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: mwdink@eskimo.com (mwdink@eskimo.com)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 11:31:08 -0700
- Hello All Since the talk about antennas and towers seems far and few between lately, I'm gonna throw something out for reflection. I've tried asking this on the Force12 reflector a couple years ago b
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00194.html (9,903 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: mike@mallardcove.com (Mike Fatchett)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:17:17 -0600
- Is there anything else on the tower other than the c31? This sounds like an interaction problem. What kind of guys are on the tower. Are there other antennas close by? Does the SWR change as you rota
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00200.html (10,848 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca (Mike & Coreen Smith)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 03:32:22 -0300
- The Nerve! Posting something actually reflector related! (TIC) ;-))))
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00201.html (11,227 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 16:52:21 -0400
- Maybe his antenna has a virus. Happy now Mike? :.) Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00206.html (12,314 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:16:01 -0600
- I would have expected your 40 ft high antenna to be better than the 100 ft high C31XR once the band opens. My experience from my own station and N4AR's super station is that 15M antennas at 80 and 90
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00209.html (12,130 bytes)
- 6. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:29:31 -0600
- That reminds me of a situation described to me by a friend. He had an A4S at 70 ft and noted it worked well on 10 and 20 but seemed less competitive on 15M. I asked about his guy wires which were pla
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00210.html (13,218 bytes)
- 7. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 20:50:44 -0400
- Yeah, except his resonance goes WAY down. This is a three band hookup, three pieces of coax to three separate DE's within a foot of each other. Caution: I find in my modeling of the C31 that what is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00213.html (14,918 bytes)
- 8. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 19:47:08 -0700
- Dink: Neither you nor any of the respondents have mentioned the easiest and most informative test you could make, in my opinion. Does the antenna show deep nulls off the ends of the elements and a re
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00216.html (11,752 bytes)
- 9. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: bob@cytanet.com.cy (Bob Henderson)
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 05:27:45 -0000
- Dink I have a C31XR up at about 70 ft fed with three seperate feeders. Each antenna is fed with 50m of HD100 coax and each has a choke balun of 12 turns of coax with a piece of 6 inch dia plastic wat
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00224.html (9,254 bytes)
- 10. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: mwdink@eskimo.com (Michael Dinkelman)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 23:07:47 -0700
- Hello Guy and everybody else Now that's an interesting possibility I haven't investigated. I think my coax situation has been unchanged since I built the antenna because they are rather well secured
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00226.html (18,393 bytes)
- 11. [Towertalk] 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 10:28:53 -0600
- At N4AR, we had among other things, a 6L15 at 90 ft and a CC 4L15 at 50 ft with a side mount rotor for EU / AF / Carib. The 6L15 at 90 ft was getting KILLED in the pileups (multiplier station of a M/
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00247.html (8,751 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu