Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+468\/f\s+\-\s+don\'t\s+bother\,\s+here\'s\s+why\s+ARRL\s+dropped\s+it\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+468\/f\s+\-\s+don\'t\s+bother\,\s+here\'s\s+why\s+ARRL\s+dropped\s+it\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] 468/f - don't bother, here's why ARRL dropped it. (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:40:00 -0400; This is just so folks know what the dipole length = 468/f business is about. Note below the wild variation in resonant frequency, impedance, and SWR limits, just by changing height. The formula just; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00397.html (12,544 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] 468/f - don't bother, here's why ARRL dropped it. (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:56:07 -0400; I feel that 468/f is just a beginning point. Look at the derived formulas for directors and reflectors in multi element beams. I found that the MULTEE antenna shown in both the ARRL and W6SAI Handboo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00409.html (10,166 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]