Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Advice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Advice\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: W1RM@attbi.com (Peter Chamalian); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:36:24 -0500; The ice storm of late November has given me the opportunity to replace all my antennas (translated, mother nature smashed all of them). I had been using a Cushcraft 402 and a Tennadyne T-10 at 100 an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00625.html (8,785 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:05:59 -0500; Please, all, post your advice to Towertalk, not just to Peter. I have virtually all the same questions as he. I've been wondering about the "D" (or higher) versions of Force 12 beams. These are heavi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00626.html (8,458 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: Jim@shawresources.com (Jim Shaw); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 12:59:11 -0800; I know that some people may react to this suggestion in a very emotional way, but if it were me, I'd post your question to the following reflector as well http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SteppIR/ What; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00627.html (10,408 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:03:51 -0500; Not emotional, but seems to me that by posting on Towertalk you capture the most folks with the most different antennas, including SteppIRs. 73, Pete N4ZR Happy Holidays; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00629.html (8,169 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] antenna advice (score: 1): Author: kz1x@yahoo.com (Steve Jackson); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:17:25 -0800 (PST); The December 4 ice storm here in NC snapped the boom of the upgraded-wind survival version of my Force12 C36XR, just behind the 6th element. Actually, it was the boom truss that did it in; the cable; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00632.html (13,187 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: KJ0M@mchsi.com (Jim Schnaidt); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 10:26:11 -0600; Pete, For 10-20 meters, including the WARC bands, have you considered the Force 12 Model 5BA? That's what I'm using. It's the D model, rated for 100 MPH. I have it mounted on a US Tower 72' retracta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00641.html (9,068 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:13:31 -0600; Pete, My 402CD survived estimated 80-90 MPH winds from a small tornado. I reinforced (double walled) the first section of each half element. I also put 6 inch wooden dowels in each end and a 12 inch; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00642.html (9,524 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: lclarks@nc.rr.com (Larry); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:19:35 -0500; check out OptiBeam they have an new 40mtr dipole and 2L Larry WA2SRY; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00643.html (10,378 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:17:13 -0500; This combination (a Force 12 230/240 and a 5BA) appeals to me, too. What can anyone tell us about how properly to stack them? In particular, how far apart should they be on a single mast above a 70-f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00647.html (8,690 bytes)
10. SV: [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: ozling@mail.dk (Henrik Weiss); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 07:19:41 +0100; I have this configuration. So does W7FU and the antennas at my place can be seen on qrz.com. Height of 5BA is 100 ft. The 230/240 is at 115 ft. The recommended spacing distance from Force12. Henrik O; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00656.html (9,644 bytes)
11. SV: [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 01:57:16 -0500; Yow! A 230/240 at the top of fifteen feet of unreinforced mast?! Is that safe? What are you using for a mast? -Chuck, W1HIS; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00658.html (8,289 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: KJ0M@mchsi.com (Jim Schnaidt); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 06:50:52 -0600; Natan told me 10 foot spacing would be fine. I never asked which would be the topmost antenna but like you, I assume it would be the 230/240. You would definitely need a chromalloy mast though! -- 73; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00660.html (8,728 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: wz7i@arrl.net (Wes Cosand); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:06:54 -0500; This combination (a Force 12 230/240 and a 5BA) appeals to me, too. I, also, am interested in the Force 12 230/240 and 5BA solution. Here are some back of the envelop calculations about what the yiel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00661.html (8,918 bytes)
14. [Towertalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:54:27 -0500; I'm not familiar in detail with the W7NI method (I read the article once ages ago) but I think there's one important caveat. Force 12 states the wind area of its antennas in their worst-case alignmen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00663.html (9,307 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] Antenna Advice (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (K1ZM@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 06:42:38 EDT; Hi Gang I have a question about band separation assuming two towers. What is the general preference about antennas on the same mast? If one has two towers, is it 20 and 15 on one tower/mast and 40 an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00532.html (7,132 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] antenna advice (score: 1): Author: "David Humelsine" <n5wmq@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:06:58 -0700; I have an opportunity to do some HF operating this summer from a cabin near Taos NM. I plan to use a Ten Tec Argonaut. The simple solution for an antenna would be a MFJ or SGC 230 antenna tuner with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00501.html (7,596 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna advice (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:21:26 -0800; Hi David I do a lot of camping in the summer here and I have found that a good old G5RV works excellent. I use an MFJ tuner and there is always somewhere to throw a rope over a tree and hoist it up.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00502.html (7,880 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna advice (score: 1): Author: "Alex Malyava" <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:58:03 -0500; yea, G5RV is the good one. I dont know how it works on 30 - i have used it for contesting only - but the rest of the bands are good. the only weirdo is the 15m band - it has relatively high impedance; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00001.html (9,079 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna advice (score: 1): Author: "Vic Sadesky" <vsadesky@ccis.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 04:06:53 -0800; Dave, I've been using your type of setup (longwire/tuner) for several years now with my RV. If you can add another 14 feet to the long wire with as many 33 foot counterpoise wires as you can, I guara; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00003.html (9,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]