Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Wind\s+Loading\s+Calculations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Wind\s+Loading\s+Calculations\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Antenna Wind Loading Calculations (score: 1): Author: thoele@txcyber.com (Troy Thoele); Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:50:28 -0500; Howdy again - I found a couple of towers, but now I need to figure out how to calculate wind loading. There seems to be so many variables, and Rohn's information seems very vague. Any help would be a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00338.html (6,893 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Antenna Wind Loading Calculations (score: 1): Author: BobK8IA@aol.com (BobK8IA@aol.com); Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:30:20 EDT; Hi Troy; If the towers can be identified as to mfr and model, the mfr can certainly supply you with the structural info you may need. If not, please bite the bullet and hire yourself a structural PE.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00339.html (7,558 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Antenna Wind Loading Calculations (score: 1): Author: k4zzr@bellsouth.net (David); Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 19:32:19 -0400; I've run into the same question myself and am really surprised that tower manufacturing companies don't give more structural info with their products. For instance, US Towers gives windloads for 50mp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00341.html (9,304 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Antenna Wind Loading Calculations (score: 1): Author: w9jcc@juno.com (Frank C Travanty); Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 11:31:35 -0500; Dave, Near as I can tell, the 70 MPH number for UST is the only one that has the PE's name behind it, and thats for the antenna at one foot above the tower top, with the tower at full height. I suspe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00349.html (11,765 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]