Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Attenuation\s+of\s+trees\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Attenuation\s+of\s+trees\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Attenuation of trees (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:33:01 -0400; will be putting up a vertical antenna for receiving this weekend....on 40 and 80 meters - one location is thick with pine trees taller than the vertical - should I even think about problems at this l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00550.html (7,705 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Attenuation of trees (score: 1): Author: ussailis@equinox.shaysnet.com (Jim Ussailis); Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 23:18:57 -0400 (EDT); Tree attenuation at 7 MHz? I shouldn't think so. N1CQ and I have agreeded to disagree on attenuation at HF. My opinion is that I see much more multipath than attenuation at 700 MHz and 2400 MHz, so t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00582.html (9,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]