Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Bi\-Square\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Bi\-Square\s+Antenna\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Bi-Square Antenna (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:17:02 -0700 (PDT); Hi Y'all, I am limited to only wire antennas at my present QTH and trying to think of some good gain wire antennas to put up. I was thinking of a Bi-Square for 10 meters - if you short the top you co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00734.html (7,304 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Bi-Square Antenna (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:37:31 -0600; One of my favorite wire antennas is a simple 20M dipole (34 ft total) fed with Ladderline. It has a figure 8 pattern from 10 thru 30 meters. Put up 2 or 3 of them at 40 to 60 ft and you will cover th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00745.html (8,954 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Bi-Square Antenna (score: 1): Author: bobharrison@shaw.ca (Bob); Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:15:51 -0600; Maybe a horizontal loop at 60' balanced feed - should get you everything from 40 up if close to 50' per leg - it's quiet and a better performer than dipoles Bob VE6BRH http://www.mscomputer.com addit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00762.html (8,587 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]