Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Can\s+my\s+40\'\s+tower\s+be\s+a\s+160m\s+vertical\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: jimleahy@adelphia.net (Jim Leahy)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 06:53:25 -0400
Hello all. I've always been under the impression that one had to have a 100' or taller tower in order to shunt feed it for 160m. Therefore, for years I've been fooling with long wires, random wires,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00849.html (9,288 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@attbi.com (kb9cry@attbi.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:04:40 +0000
QSL on all Jim. Purchase Jeff Briggs, K1ZM's book from the ARRL titled "DXing on the Edge, The Thrill of 160 Meters" In it you'll find all the info and hints to shunt feed your tower. I did the same
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00856.html (11,169 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@attbi.com (kb9cry@attbi.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:07:09 +0000
Also Jim, you'll need something to receive on. The shunt fed tower is a vertical and you'll get all sorts of noise. There's a website that has a compendium of lowband beverage, pennants, flags, delta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00857.html (11,062 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: joe@xyz.net (WL7M)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:08:15 -0800
Jim - Your personal e-mail bounced for some reason, hope you get this reply through the reflector....... Hi Jim, Yes, it can be done! I've had great success with the shunt fed system on my 40 foot to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00862.html (12,046 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:24:03 -0400
Jim: I agree with Phil's recommendations on Jeff's book. You can get it from ARRL. I based my Trylon 64's shunt feed on Jeff's design. The key is to have something as a capacitive load at or near the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00864.html (13,834 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:21:19 -0500
Yes, but if you get it from ARRL, then you have to PAY for it. Oh, wait, the ARRL as capitalist pigs thing is on another reflector. Sorry. 73, kelly ve4xt -- Original Message -- From: "EUGENE SMAR" <
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00865.html (15,818 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: jperalta@tampabay.rr.com (jperalta@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:47:07 US/Eastern
Aren't radials also needed to make the shunt fed tower work efficiently? If so what would be the correct length and how many for a respectable installation? Julio, W4hy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00866.html (10,099 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@attbi.com (kb9cry@attbi.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:02:27 +0000
The more the merrier, 30 minimum. Length not that critical but 1/4 wavelength at 130 ft. is theoretical best. Most recommend 60 radials and broadcasters go with 120. Last year I have about 30 down (p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00867.html (11,479 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: donhall@myriad.net (Don K5AQ)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:32:24 -0500
I agree that a lot of radials are desirable. I now have 32 each longer than a quarter wavelength, BUT at my previous location on a tiny city lot I had two(2) laid alongside my sprinkler lines snaking
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00868.html (8,697 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:59:08 -0600
YES. IF you can get 1/4 WL (or more) then 30 to 60 radials is beneficial. IF you are limited to 1/8 WL long radials, there is virtually NO benefit above 15 radials. Tom N4KG _________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00870.html (11,576 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:36:14 -0400
Julio: Yes, radials are needed. For my shunt-fed tower I have only 7 radials, only five of which are over 100 feet long. The other two are 30 feet long. BUT - this tower has a pretty decent lightning
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00873.html (11,334 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Mac" <w5mc@sbcglobal.net (Mac)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:50:52 -0500
You have a problem with capitalism ?? not near as much as I do with socialism... -- Original Message -- From: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca> To: "EUGENE SMAR" <spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net>; <kb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00918.html (17,867 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:51:33 -0700
OK then please explain why hy-gain in their manual for the 14AVQ has a table for optimum ground system configurations as radials 16 24 36 60 90 120 lengthin wl 0.1 0.125 0.15 0.2 0,25 0.4 feed point
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00936.html (9,127 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 22:47:01 -0400
Whether or not a radial density is enough by count depends on the "aperture" that exists between adjacent radials at the ends, as expressed in a fraction of a wavelength at the frequency in use. If t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00937.html (12,433 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] Can my 40' tower be a 160m vertical? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:11:12 -0600
Perhaps I should have said there is only a very small benefit to having more than 15 radials IF they are equal or less than 0.125 WL long. THE definitive work on radial systems was published in the J
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00938.html (10,461 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu