Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Choices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Choices\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:21:29 -0700; [Steve Katz] I agree with you, although others have reported their G5RV's working all the planets and several distant galaxies with no problems. I guess "whatever works" for you is the right thing t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00314.html (11,483 bytes)
22. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: joe@xyz.net (WL7M); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 12:34:25 -0800; Hey! Try being in Alaska!! ;-) 73, Joe WL7M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00315.html (11,873 bytes)
23. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:09:57 -0400; NEC-4 can model every detail that you've mentioned, and many more, e.g., insulation on the wire, both lumped and distributed loading, and traps. If you know what you're doing, it works. I've modeled; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00318.html (10,189 bytes)
24. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:15:00 -0400; 1. We East Coast guys work Central, South, and Southeast Asia through the aurora. Sometimes western Asia, too. 2. The path from MA to the UK is often in the radio aurora. It was for much of the last; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00319.html (8,549 bytes)
25. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: Mark <AA6DX@pacbell.net> (Mark); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 14:19:26 -0700; Try it in F A I R B A N K S Alaska! 73 .. Mark . AA6DX op, KL7RA .. 2 yrs as AA6DX/KL7, North Pole .......... while; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00320.html (9,074 bytes)
26. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: htodd@twofifty.com (Hisashi T Fujinaka); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT); At least people want to talk to you in Alaska. I guess Oregon isn't THAT bad. I worked my first 100+ countries on an inverted-vee with the peak at 35' or less (just above the house.) So I know about; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00321.html (13,453 bytes)
27. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: schiers@netins.net (hasan schiers); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:11:47 -0500; But a G5RV, including one rigged as an inverted-V, is _not_ an inefficient antenna, and no one should avoid using it because of comments like "I wouldn't mount a G5RV as an inverted vee; actually a G; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00323.html (10,966 bytes)
28. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 19:45:09 -0400; Yeah, but you're DX!!! That adds at least 3 S units to your signal strength doesn't it??? 73 Gil, W1RG; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00328.html (10,295 bytes)
29. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: Mark <AA6DX@pacbell.net> (Mark); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:26:03 -0700; NOT if you are trying to hear the other station .. at ALL .. =];-} -- Original Message -- From: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net> To: "Mark" <AA6DX@pacbell.net> Cc: <towertalk@contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00330.html (11,669 bytes)
30. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: Mark <AA6DX@pacbell.net> (Mark); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:30:02 -0700; Just happens, I disagree .. no modeling, just experience, especially in early 80s .. G5RV worky worky, but no way as good as a full real dipole, with no antenna fuses holding up the parade .. really; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00332.html (13,322 bytes)
31. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: w8aef@worldnet.att.net (Paul Playford); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:42:15 -0000; Us hams on the outside of the auroral oval have a tendency to forget about the hams inside the auroral oval. And that comes from the RF black hole of Arizona. de Paul, W8AEF while; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00334.html (8,697 bytes)
32. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: stevekz9g@speakeasy.net (Steve Gehring); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 19:16:13 -0700; 3 S-unit advantage??? Not based on my 7 years of operation there... Negative S-unit(s) maybe... I'll have to agree with Mark concerning his operating comments in Alaska. After living in the Anchorage; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00335.html (12,351 bytes)
33. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:53:09 -0600; ANY antenna is better than NO antenna :-) My 130 ft high 80M dipoles are better than my old 100 ft inverted vee which was better than my 70 ft high dipole which was better than my previous 70 ft high; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00337.html (11,519 bytes)
34. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 23:31:17 -0500; Not anything like us here. That's one reason why you guys can start runs to Europe a couple hours earlier and keep them going a couple hours longer than us. And yes, it helps to be closer to them by; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00338.html (9,058 bytes)
35. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 23:36:17 -0500; I'd agree with you Hasan. Also, keep in mind to that the currents and voltages in each leg of a dipole are opposite in both sign and in phase. I've read some literature that suggests you actually get; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00339.html (9,525 bytes)
36. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 01:03:33 -0400; Thank you for making this important point, although "any" may be a slight overstatement. You are correct that, if an antenna is more than a half-wavelength long, then bending it (e.g., into an invert; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00340.html (9,872 bytes)
37. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:26:48 -0600; N4KG comments added below. It's even worse than that...Not only do the W1's enjoy an EXCLUSIVE first hour to EU due to their earlier sunrise, but they can hear hundreds more of the super weak Europea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00341.html (9,795 bytes)
38. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: k4zzr@bellsouth.net (k4zzr@bellsouth.net); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 1:35:41 -0400; I tried, but I'm still here.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00342.html (7,862 bytes)
39. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: kq2m@earthlink.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:23 -0400; to than GET REAL! First you give us hyperbole that says we don't understand what it is like to have signals pass through the Auroral oval, then, when you are challenged, rather than acknowledge your; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00345.html (9,065 bytes)
40. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: kq2m@earthlink.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:54:28 -0400; It should be like that as we are that much closer to EU. Of course, when there is Aurora, or cndx are disturbed, we hear a lot of Auroral buzz and the guys in FL kill us. That's when being 1000 mile; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00347.html (9,210 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]