Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Dismantling\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Dismantling\s+towers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Dismantling towers (score: 1): Author: mpride@us.ibm.com (Mark Pride); Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:10:02 -0400; Here is another caution when taking down someone else's tower. Disconnecting guys along the way up and dropping the sections in thirty minutes is quite a feat (in stupidity). I once took down a tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00659.html (7,634 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Dismantling towers (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:44:28 -0400 (EDT); with rohn 25 my prefered method is to come off the tower at the bottom set of guys, take them off then lift the tower off the base and use the guys to lay it over like a field day tower. its harder t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00661.html (9,304 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Dismantling towers (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:03:43 -0600; Another N4KG NEVERism: NEVER *assume* a tower base alone will support an unguyed tower, even just a few sections unless you KNOW the exact details of the base. Rohn cautions that most tower accidents; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00720.html (9,517 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Dismantling towers (score: 1): Author: billwall@eyecon-solutions.com (Bill Wall); Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 19:34:42 -0400; Hi all; Tom is correct about old towers and taking them down. You have no idea of the engineering that was used in the erection of this unknown tower. Just one story. An extra class Ham, a friend of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00756.html (12,067 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]