Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Field\s+Strength\s+vs\.\s+Radial\s+Field\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Field\s+Strength\s+vs\.\s+Radial\s+Field\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: [Towertalk] Field Strength vs. Radial Field (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:59:27 -0600; Here is the 1937 Field Intensity Data vs Radial Field followed by a conversion to dB relative to 113 radials 0.411 WL long. This was originally posted 3 / 2002. Tom N4KG Here is the data from the ori; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00944.html (9,974 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Field Strength vs. Radial Field (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:58:42 -0600; Here is the data from the original definitive study on Field Strength at 1 mile versus Number and Length of Radials as described by Brown, Lewis, and Epstein in the June 1937 Proceedings of the IRE (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00164.html (9,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]