Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Grounding\s+an\s+Elevated\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Grounding\s+an\s+Elevated\s+vertical\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] Grounding an Elevated vertical (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:54:09 EST; Question that is bothering me: If we have vertical installed over sloping terrain, how does that affect the far field effect on the radiation pattern close to horizon? Do we see some "salt water" eff; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00126.html (9,332 bytes)
22. [Towertalk] Grounding an Elevated vertical (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com (K4IA@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:54:55 EST; << 2) E-plane penetration of the ground and resultant lossy current immediately below. Solved with moderate DENSE ground screen. The worst loss is right underneath, so even radials shorter than 1/4 w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00129.html (9,860 bytes)
23. [Towertalk] Grounding an Elevated vertical (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 00:21:44 -0500; See below. 73, Guy. mechanism Where back into make the It is not necessary for elements in an RF system to be literally interconnected by wires. If it were, transformers would not work. Yagi's would; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00154.html (10,808 bytes)
24. [Towertalk] Grounding an Elevated vertical (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:17:29 -0500; I have an R7000 at 8 feet, which I used as my primary antenna for almost 6 years. My observations match Stu's. You can make contacts with this antenna, but there are better choices. Bill Coleman, AA4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00485.html (8,374 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]