Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Guy\s+Lengths\,\s+climbing\s+unguyed\s+tower\s+sections\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Guy\s+Lengths\,\s+climbing\s+unguyed\s+tower\s+sections\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:29:57 EST; PUCKER FACTOR, AHOY! As you've seen, climbing is 90% mental. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00012.html (7,021 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: rwing@southwind.net (Randy Wing); Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:49:53 -0600; I always use temporary guys (ropes) when I go above one unguyed section. Randy N0LD convince; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00017.html (8,263 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 06:33:20 -0600; You're right! When we did my tower, we guyed it around 25 feet for the first set. The next set was going to be at approximately the 50 foot level. The day we put the top sections up, we had 2 excelle; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00029.html (8,752 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: n1lo@hotmail.com (Mark .); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:24:10 -0500; Tom wrote: << I'm interested in guys lengths as well. If one were to use 130 feet of rohn 25 for 160M or 80M. The nearest other tower is about 300 feet away. The guy anchors are about 60' from the ba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00866.html (7,994 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:41:24 -0500; Cringe is right. I think I would only do it with a crane! I've been on top of 4 unguyed sections -- well, guyed at 31, next guy set being installed at 62, so I was 8 feet down from the top of the 4th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00869.html (7,649 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:01:24 -0400; I've found (and others have agreed) that when on a tower that has one guy set installed (say at 31') and you are working on the second, yetuninstalled, set (say at 62') this oscillation is the worst.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00870.html (7,562 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Guy Lengths, climbing unguyed tower sections (score: 1): Author: olinger@bellsouth.net (olinger@bellsouth.net); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:33:21 -0500; Working at 90 feet on Rohn 25 with guys at 35 and 68 feet was just plain nasty. Took every bit of mental teeth gritting I could muster to convince myself I was not swinging into the ground. Wasn't an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00876.html (9,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]