- 1. [Towertalk] HDX-555 specs (score: 1)
- Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:23:23 EDT
- Hi Frank: Like Steve, K7LXC, your Excel program has my interest as well. I would appreciate it if you could please copy me on anything that you send to Steve as well -- I do have Excel -- I am partic
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00001.html (6,903 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] HDX-555 specs (score: 1)
- Author: k4zzr@bellsouth.net (David)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:12:07 -0400
- The PE sheets that were sent for my yet-to-be-delivered US Towers HDX-555 have increased the hole size to 5'x5'x6.5' and larger rebar (the website says 4'x4'x6'). When I asked what the windload ratin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00428.html (7,371 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] HDX-555 specs (score: 1)
- Author: w9jcc@juno.com (Frank C Travanty)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 20:28:36 -0500
- David, If you have Excel on your computer I will send you a spreadsheet that is already set up for the HDX-555. You simply need to input your antenna parameters (wind load & height above the tower) a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00432.html (8,911 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] HDX-555 specs (score: 1)
- Author: k4zzr@bellsouth.net (David)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:58:14 -0400
- Hi Frank....I might have Excel on one of my office PC's so that would be great if you could send the spreadsheet my way. There was no explanation for the size change, but the specs note that this is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00433.html (9,953 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] HDX-555 specs (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 23:56:26 EDT
- So you're an engineer and used engineering calculations in your spreadsheet? What assumptions did you make? Does it conform to any kind of accepted engineering or construction specs? What formulas di
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00434.html (7,444 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu