Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+HF2V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+HF2V\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: k7mks@attbi.com (k7mks); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 09:32:07 -0700; Good morning: I'd be interested in performance comments on the Butternut HF2V ground mounted, w/ or w/o the top loading kit. Thanks in advance. Joe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00131.html (7,423 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@hotmail.com (Eddy Avila); Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 19:37:59 +0000; I've been using the HF2V ground-mounted about 2 years now and speaking only about dx signals on 80 the vertical equals and sometimes better than my dipole which isn't very high off the ground. On 40; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00137.html (9,577 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 12:33:34 -0600; In a word, it SUCKS on 80M. OK on 40M. Tom N4KG Dual Band Verticals for 80 and 40 meters - de N4KG The HF-2V is full size (or nearly so) on 40M but base loaded on 80M. Base loading is the LEAST effic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00138.html (10,193 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: bill@axelrods.org (Bill Axelrod); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 20:31:02 -0400; Another vote. My dummy load outperforms my GAP Titan on 80 meters. My Butternut with 30 short radials outperformed the dummy load on 80 meters by 5 to 6 S units. My G5RV mounted as an inverted Vee wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00146.html (11,893 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@attbi.com (Phil - KB9CRY); Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 22:26:43 -0500; Joe, my HF2V helped me work 5BDXCC from my small city lot (35 x 125) within 5 years. It was mounted back next to the garage in the Victory garden. It was "guyed" with 40 lb. test fishing line so that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00150.html (9,727 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: k7mks@attbi.com (k7mks); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:01:13 -0700; Many thanks to all who commented on my inquiry regarding the HF2V. The concensus seemed to be it was an effective 40m antenna when used with an efficient ground system. 80m operation comments indicat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00168.html (7,974 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]