Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+on\s+40\/80\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+on\s+40\/80\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1): Author: genewill@ordata.com (Gene A. Williamson); Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 11:03:31 -0700; All this discussion of HF2V, radials, etc. causes me to wonder: if the inverted "L" is so great for 160, why isn't it used on 40 and 80? 73 Gene N7YW; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00227.html (7,006 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:28:02 -0600; 80? The main problem on 160M is the size of a 1/4 WL vertical (130 ft). The inverted L is a useful alternative that allows shorter supports to be used for that band. One down side to the inverted L i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00235.html (8,166 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:06:14 -0400; I'm assuming you mean the common L, which is vertically polarized. On 160, a wave can penetrate deeper and cut a larger cross-section of earth. Because of that, losses are generally less. The best e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00239.html (8,132 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:02:03 -0400; A practical dipole has a clear transmitting advantage on 40 in most cases because it is easy to make high in terms of the operating wavelength, while a practical Inverted L or vertical has the clear; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00250.html (7,693 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1): Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist); Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:09:46 -0700; I compared a 90 foot high inverted vee on 20 meters to a ground mounted vertical. About 3/4 of the time, they were too close to tell apart. The rest of the time, the vee was a few dB better. One time; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00280.html (9,019 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]