Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+MAXX\-COMM\s+AUTOMACTIC\s+TUNER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+MAXX\-COMM\s+AUTOMACTIC\s+TUNER\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (David Jordan); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:00:00 -0500; Hi Folks, Has anyone figured out just what this tuner is made of? It has no electrical connections for power yet is it claimed to be automatic and yet it supposedly matches a wire or dipole to any fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00533.html (9,260 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:37:30 -0800; What web page would that be? "If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough." - Mario Andretti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00537.html (9,106 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:08:10 -0500; Hmmm.. I seem to remember this device from the '70's. It was advertized to match anything anywhere... The package was completely potted, and unaccessible to inspection. Somebody, I think QST, had one; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00541.html (11,072 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:13:43 EST; This product was reviewed in November 1984 in QST...looks like snakeoil. Bill K4XS; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00542.html (7,539 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:03:48 -0800; Oh, geesh...that piece of junk still around? It's "all solid state," alright. It's a toroid and a dummy load built into a metal case, as the ARRL determined when they X-Rayed it. Cost to build: Proba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00543.html (11,065 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: nielsen@oz.net (Bob Nielsen); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:35:02 -0800; All was revealed in QST, November 1984 (http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr8411.pdf). Summary: It contains several resistors and a matching transformer. I wouldn't spend any of my money o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00544.html (9,677 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:14:11 -0500; It is the same -- www.maxx-com.com. These guys have a lot of gall. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00547.html (10,173 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:14:23 -0800; You guys are so negative! The Maxx-Com requires no power because it's powered by RF, which is dissipated internally creating thermal rise; that thermal rise is used to spin fan blades which drive a r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00549.html (11,046 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:26:58 -0500; Geez, and made right here in my back yard.. Ft. Lauderdale.. Anybody wanna by some snake oil?? Cures anything you got, and stuff you don't know you have.. Especially heavy pockets.. $$$$ Later all, G; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00550.html (10,619 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: kcechura@umr.edu (Ken Cechura); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:29:32 -0600; I have to ask...they have "military" listed.... Are they selling these to our enemies? Certainly OUR military isnt using them..... Right? --Original Message-- From: towertalk-admin@contesting.com [ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00551.html (10,875 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:39:41 -0500; Ummm... If it's expensive, it must be good, right?? Let's buy two, just in case... W1RG; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00552.html (12,302 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:39:36 -0700; Newton's 8th law of thermoliguistics: "Sales increase proportionately to the dummy-loading down of the American consumer". Matt--K7BG -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-vir; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00553.html (8,965 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:31:12 -1000; The operating theory for this tuner is, well....amazing: "The electro-magnetic field generated by a dipole matched with a MAXX-COM device is somewhat different than with a resonant tuner. A resonant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00559.html (10,079 bytes)
14. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: lclarks@nc.rr.com (Larry); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:07:16 -0500; http://www.maxx-com.com/ Larry WA2SRY 6M.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00563.html (11,732 bytes)
15. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:58:42 -0800; I'm impressed. I note the "reviews" (there are only two posted) are (1) unsigned and unnamed and then (2) from Worldradio magazine, who accepts advertising from Maxx-com. QST tossed them many years a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00564.html (11,087 bytes)
16. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com (llindblom@juno.com); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:36:04 GMT; Was that a typo on your part? Maybe you intended to type "amusing" rather than "amazing". W0ETC (hey, maybe I should found the ETC (Extreme Tuner Company) and give these guy competition. The operatin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00565.html (10,273 bytes)
17. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:42:47 -0500; My understanding is that the permanent magnets will be placed in a"super conductive" liquid material, and wrapped within a cylinder of liquid nitrogen. The resultant increase in wave velocity beyond; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00567.html (8,750 bytes)
18. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:53:45 EST; I think the maker of the MaxcComm needs to be introduced to the maker of the CB antennas that was mentioned on this site a year or two ago. Their claims are equally amazing. If it seems too good to b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00568.html (7,670 bytes)
19. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:04:15 -0800; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00569.html (8,894 bytes)
20. [Towertalk] MAXX-COMM AUTOMACTIC TUNER (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (k4oj); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:24:57 -0500; ...sounds like the scam nack in the seventies - someone was selling a wonder box - the box contained something potted in epoxy or similar - when x-rayed at the ARRL lab it was found to contain random; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00580.html (9,529 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]