Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+More\s+on\s+Lightning\s+protection\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: K4WSB@arrl.net (Jack)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:52:28 -0400
May I suggest this company as an alternative way of thinking regarding lightning protection The last thing anyone wants is to make yourself a target. This company has a different approach... their sy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00361.html (8,425 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Barockteer@aol.com (Barockteer@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:29:36 -0400
Well, there seems to be two approaches t lightning: 1. Protect your equipment in the event of a hit. 2. Do something that reduces the probability of a hit. My question is : Can approach #2 reduce tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00362.html (8,007 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Mark <AA6DX@arrl.net> (Mark)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:20:17 -0700
Best yet ... see that your insurance policy covers lightning strike damage, and have all info on hand ... pix, specs, prices, paperwork as applicable .. receipts, etc....... bon chance! Mark .. AA6DX
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00363.html (8,761 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:33:36 -0000
I seem to remember that k1dg had the ultimate way to reduce the chance of getting hit by lightning to zero some years ago. It was quite by accident that he installed a tower upside down placing the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00364.html (9,255 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 19:00:28 EDT
Actually the primary reason for a lightning suppression system is to keep the charges OUT of your building or house where the equipment is. Move? Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00365.html (8,969 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: vk2lee@maxnet.net.au (Lee Noonan)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:16:51 +1000
Well, I have just had all My antennas replaced.....all cables....New rotator.....New Computer.....paid for by the insurance company.......The assessor said My claim with many photos and explanations
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00366.html (9,682 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: w5lu@hotmail.com (S. J. Blackwell)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 23:30:07 +0000
I am not sure there is anything that can be done to lower the probability of a hit except lower the antenna. It would seem that the thrust is to lower the amount of energy that gets to the shack and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00368.html (10,029 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 02:03:38 +0000
If I recall correctly, K1DG planned on 4 sets of guys, reasoning that 4 sets are better than 3. He had installed 2 sets so far, planning on installing the final 2 the next day, when a big windstorm c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00371.html (11,816 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:15:01 -0400
The only known way to reduce the probability of a lightning hit by "bleeding off" charge is by sending a streamer of ions up to the cloud...since it is the cloud that actually has the concentrated c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00373.html (9,591 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: drboz@pacbell.net (Donald R. Bozarth)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 19:21:13 -0700
As I understand lightning, it happens when the difference in potential between the "sky" and the "ground" becomes great enough that a discharge becomes the law. I'm told that one way to help ensure t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00374.html (11,596 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:37:03 EDT
to dissipaters. likely Anecdotal, but it striked me. I was hit few times by lightning when I had "inferior" (tribanders, small) antennas on the tower. When I had 3 el. 40m Telrex, lightning seemed to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00375.html (9,180 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: ww5l@gte.net (Tom Anderson)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:37:14 -0500
LEE ET. AL.: Another thing to watch with lightning claims is the length of time your policy allows for processing claims. My claim rep. said he wanted a statement from the licensed electrician who ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00376.html (12,772 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:39:49 -0400
How do you put the guys underground? :-) Bob KQ2M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00377.html (9,121 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: k1dg@ix.netcom.com (Doug Grant)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 23:14:55 -0400
As much as I would like to take full credit for the scientific advances in antenna system design and installation brought forth by installing the first 30 feet of a tower upside down, that honor goes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00378.html (10,075 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@ptd.net (Bob Puharic)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 03:31:33 -0000
Remember visiting the Eiffel Tower a few yrs ago...lotsa sharp spikes sticking up from the top of that thing.... is things avoid large
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00379.html (9,937 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: vk2lee@maxnet.net.au (Lee Noonan)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 13:38:29 +1000
Hello Tom, Well, Would You believe the insurance assessor just rang to see how I was going with the antenna erection..... I have something like 3 years to report any thing else I might find was damag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00380.html (16,827 bytes)

17. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: N6ZO@aol.com (N6ZO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:54:27 EDT
I have had occasion to visit the Naval Weapon station at Charleston SC. This is where the boomers tie up to load and unload missles. There are two 250 foot towers erected and the sub ties up at a pie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00383.html (8,605 bytes)

18. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 10:05:33 -0400
Chapter 15 of the original Polyphaser "Grounds" book describes a radius of protection that is conferred by a grounded tower, based on the physics of the step leader that precedes lightning. They say
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00389.html (9,460 bytes)

19. [Towertalk] More on Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: k9zm@frontiernet.net (Greg Gobleman)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 21:23:32 -0500
take I don't know about that. You may remember me relating the strike the must have taken place here. Found water in the house. Called my contractor and he checked the roof that he had put on. Found
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00407.html (8,902 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu