This was quoted recently (without apparently, the writer's explicit permission): <<...the bill would allow 95 feet WITHOUT a variance hearing.>> Did I miss something? This quote seems to suggest that
Dave, According to the information I obtained in 2000, when I got my building permit, Gwinnett county does not place a limit on tower height. However, depending on height, the requirements obtaining
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:11:32 -0400
I agree with N2EA that hams outside New York should not comment on the Tower Bill. I have been to meetings on towers in different counties and the politicians get annoyed at what they call outsiders.
I agree, 40M beams play VERY WELL at 90 to 100 ft. when sunspot activity is Medium to High. I would hate to give up my 80M dipoles at 130 ft. I wish they were at 160 ft ! As someone else said, EVERY
It would be inappropriate--and probably negative in impact, for out of state hams to comment on a NY legislative matter. However, if this law does, indeed, specify a 95 foot limit, it's a gross mista
You must live in a different world. Most of the Ham community would be quite pleased with HF antennas allowed up to 95 ft. Bruce -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative t
I agree, 95 feet on the east coast (NY) would be a great height. We do very well in DX contests with a 2 element 40 at 70 feet. 95 would be even better!! 73, Ted K2QMF _______________________________
And there you have it the definitive answer is its ok if most people are happy with it...I don't think so! Put me on the list for unhappy with 95 feet - I am not an average ham, I am the one who spec
OJ, with your skill as a contest operator, one does not need the highest or most elaborate antenna. You could compete on a CB whip. Contest rules provide categories for MM, SO, HP, LP, QRP etc. If th
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:47:22 -0800 (Alaskan Daylight Time)
And here in Alaska, those of us living in the "bush" are authorized a 200 foot tower under the State of Alaska PRB-1. That's the way we wrote it - depending upon the degree of "civilization" around u
No the topic is still the same! Point is that there should not be a number placed on this - there are already enough friggin' laws governing this stuff ALL WE NEED IS AN EXCEPTION FOR ANTENNAS DEDICA