Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Prosistel\s+Rotors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Prosistel\s+Rotors\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: W1RM@attbi.com (Peter Chamalian); Date: Tue Jan 28 11:48:14 2003; Does anyone have first-hand experience with these rotors? Any thoughts on it vs. GS2800? Thanks Pete, W1RM; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00489.html (7,138 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com); Date: Tue Jan 28 19:58:45 2003; Hi I used to have two ham 4 rotors which lasted about a year or so then the gear (the steel one) would go or the brake would strip. I replaced them with the smallest Prosistels 2.5 years ago and they; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00502.html (7,400 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue Jan 28 20:30:38 2003; I have a friend who just put up a Prosistel rotor. It's one of the smallest they make (second smallest one). It is a BEAUTIFUL rotor. There is ZERO and I mean ZERO play in it. While I can wiggle my H; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00505.html (8,255 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: rmcgaver@wi.rr.com (Richardf McGaver); Date: Tue Jan 28 22:41:34 2003; I have the 61, bought it at Dayton a few years ago. NO PROBLEMS HERE. I had 2 tailtwisters that failed, enough for me, and the Yaseu 1000sdx that the mast clamp broke and the unit could'nt handle a M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00515.html (7,944 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed Jan 29 07:41:07 2003; Oh? You're about to hear something else. The K-factor they use to rate them is VERY protective of the hardware, because it pretends that the whole weight of the antenna is at the turning radius. I ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00524.html (8,233 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (tombaugh); Date: Wed Jan 29 08:11:50 2003; I too use a Yaesu 800SDX (I think) To turn a C4SXL and a few smaller VHF beams for 54 years at full speed without a blink. I'm sure the prosistels are great but don't knock 'em 'til you've tried 'em.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00525.html (9,406 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Jan 29 10:48:23 2003; First, the K-Factor (and Hy-Gain's Effective Moment) are both ESTIMATES of rotator capacity. radius. You lost me. The turning radius is a distance measurement so at what point on the turning radius w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00531.html (7,864 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed Jan 29 14:03:07 2003; Well, it sure isn't all the way out at the full radius. K-factor uses the turning radius, which for HF antennas tends to be the circle described by the tip of the longest element. That badly overstat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00541.html (9,217 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] prosistel rotors (score: 1): Author: KB2HUK@aol.com (KB2HUK@aol.com); Date: Wed Jan 29 18:47:30 2003; <PRE>Thanks for all the help on obtaining information on the prosistal rotors. John; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00555.html (7,108 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: Chuck@dxham.net (Chuck Sudds); Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 16:36:59 -0500; Greetings! I was wondering if anyone had any first-hand experience using the Prosistel rotors. They certainly appear to be big and rugged!! Opinions? Chuck - KØTVD; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00258.html (7,793 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: José de Sá" <ct1eeb@mail.telepac.pt (José de Sá); Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:30:10 +0100; I got one, rotating my 3 el. KLM 40m. monobander and a 4 El. WARC 2x2 Beam in a 25m. Crank-up tower. It never gave me problems in this strong Atlantic winds, its definitelly a heavy duty rotator. Als; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00260.html (8,377 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: rmcgaver@wi.rr.com (Richard McGaver); Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 09:54:47 -0500; I've had mine up about a year now and its works A1. I am rotating a PRO-57 at 50'. Mine is a PST61. I opted for the larger because I never want to replace a rotator again. It's mounted in a Rohn HDBX; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00263.html (8,393 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@exotrope.net (WA2BPE); Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 13:53:13 -0400; Drop a note to ON4ANT. He did have one fail due to an apparant bad weld but Prosistel was quick to replace it. He is, however, rotating a massive EME-capable six meter array with it. Check out: < htt; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00285.html (8,832 bytes)
14. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: José de Sá" <ct1eeb@mail.telepac.pt (José de Sá); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:21:58 +0100; Ok guys Theres always a first time. Only last week I was saying good things about the Prosistel heavy-duty rotator. Today we had strong winds peaking 100 Km/H, the crank-up tower was only 15 m. high; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00387.html (9,116 bytes)
15. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:24:14 -0600; Sorry to hear about the broken rotor Jose. In order to NOT miss the DXpedition, I suggest putting a rope over one end of the boom and tieing it down so that the beams are aimed in the desired directi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00399.html (10,408 bytes)
16. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@exotrope.net (WA2BPE); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:02:33 -0400; José, Sri the rotator broke. Pse keep us informed as to how Prosistal responds; their explanation for the failure + their promptness to respond. They should understand that this type of inform; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00403.html (9,944 bytes)
17. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: pb0aiu@pi4cc.nl (Peter); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:56:33 +0200; Jose Which model did you have installed? Just wondering. We haved de PST 71 up in the tower Peter -- Internet DX-cluster telnet://213.10.48.91 DX-cluster info http://www.pi4cc.nl/dxcluster; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00404.html (9,916 bytes)
18. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: José de Sá" <ct1eeb@mail.telepac.pt (José de Sá); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:11:42 +0100; Hello Thank you very much for all your answers concerning the Prosistel rotator. Here are some more details: A) The problem: The problem really are the Hex-screws that tight together the base of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00410.html (9,783 bytes)
19. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: shr@ricc.net (W0UN--John Brosnahan); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:14:54 -0500; Jose-- I am sure that Jose will be well taken care of. I was very impressed with the service from Gianni when I was working on a PST71 for A61AJ. Gianni was very helpful in making some changes for u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00416.html (9,702 bytes)
20. [Towertalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1): Author: wa2bpe@exotrope.net (WA2BPE); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:07:28 -0400; José, Perhaps someone else can be more specific, but I do not believe RTV is what you want to use for a thread locker. Here in the states, a common brand used is "Loctite" (several composition; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00425.html (11,039 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]