Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Quad\s+vs\s+Yagi\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Quad\s+vs\s+Yagi\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: bjk@ihug.co.nz (Barry Kirkwood); Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:48:55 +1300; I know of but one comparative study of quads and yagis in the field that = seems to me to meet scientific standards. Cannot remember the reference, but it was in Ham Radio a long time ago. Method: Tw; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00417.html (9,008 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:01:59 -0800; The actual article to which ZL1DD refers is in the May 1979 issue of Ham Radio magazine, and entitled, "Quads vs. Yagis Revisited," by Dr. Wayne Overbeck, N6NB. A photo from that article, and a littl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00427.html (11,748 bytes)
3. Fw: [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: bjk@ihug.co.nz (Barry Kirkwood); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:02:15 +1300; Further note: i may be in error with exact figure of quad loop gain over dipole. have loaned my w4pv book. sorry about all lower case but typing one hand as large cat insists on being cuddled. 73 end; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00445.html (13,457 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: k4bp@yahoo.com (Jeff Walker); Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:54:54 -0800 (PST); I have the complete article from '79 HR if anyone is interested. Jeff k4bp@arrl.net http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/woverbeck/antgain.htm http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk http:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00478.html (13,909 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: billwall@eyecon-solutions.com (Bill Wall); Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:54:09 -0500; Hi All: I hope everyone got the article on radiation EFF. About multi-el Quads. The trick is in spacing and reducing the director sizes out to the fourth director. The Driven is resonated first and t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00516.html (10,162 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:45:22 -0500; While real world construction can modify results, and there are well-known noise performance and ease of construction differences between quads and yagis, comparing the two in idealized circumstances; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00524.html (9,462 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:18:07 -0800; A recurring theme that I have noticed in this and other threads on the quad versus the yagi is the anecdotal claim that quads are quieter for receiving than the equivalent Yagi. There could be a good; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00530.html (13,180 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: cqki8fh@juno.com (dan r goddard); Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:14:35 -0800; You any of you have any comments to make about the use of a Quad antenna over a Yagi? Thanks Dan -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00127.html (6,734 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@arrl.net (Eddy Avila); Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 16:35:03 -0000; Y I K E S!!! Dan, now you'll get them going for sure!! :-} To: <towertalk@contesting.com> _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00128.html (8,790 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier); Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:35:29 -0700; Yes, as long as they are not too close together, they'll both work fine....... --Dave K0QE -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00129.html (7,547 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: randy@kk7tv.com (Randy Starace); Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 14:32:27 -0700; Hi Name is Randy KK7TV. I have a kt34xa and a 40c2 on a rotating tower. They are both KLM's. I have had them up for 12 years. I am thinking of building a Quad, 4 elements on a 30 foot boom. 10-20 inc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00265.html (7,794 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: randy@kk7tv.com (Randy Starace); Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 15:14:05 -0700; Hi Name is Randy KK7TV. I have a kt34xa and a 40c2 on a rotating tower. They are both KLM's. I have had them up for 12 years. I am thinking of building a Quad, 4 elements on a 30 foot boom. 10-20 inc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00266.html (7,774 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 18:40:22 -0400; You may want to have a look at the May 1979 and May 1982 issues of Ham Radio magazine. Wayne, N6NB, has a lengthy study of yagis versus quads and generally concludes that there is little true differe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00268.html (8,971 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] Quad Vs Yagi (score: 1): Author: n7ml@imt.net (Michael Lamb); Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 22:56:33 -0600; David: A few years ago I put up a stack of six triband yagis on a rotating 190 foot Rohn 55G tower. For the next 18 months or so I got a big thrill out of playing DXpedition working Europeans hour af; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00291.html (10,325 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]