Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Antennas\]\s+Comparison\!\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re: [Antennas] Comparison!! (score: 1)
Author: elemmon@impulse.net (Eric Lemmon)
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:28:07 -0700
Sherman, A proper answer to your question must consider WHICH "Super Stationmaster" antenna you are comparing to the DB616. If the choice was between the DB616 and the PD220-2 Super Stationmaster, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00393.html (10,275 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Re: [Antennas] Comparison!! (score: 1)
Author: sherman@mscomputer.com (Sherman Leifer)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:50:28 -0400
I would just like to thank everyone who had replied to my question. As I thought the Celwave Super Stationmaster appears to be the winner. The model is the PD620, which is the heavy duty version of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00394.html (13,744 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Re: [Antennas] Comparison!! (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:19:21 -0400
They make terrible lightning rods, and the precipitation static on almost any top mounted antenna will kill the receiver during storms. My personal selection, after much thought, was a DB224E four-d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00428.html (9,698 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu